Amber Sprenger, Ph.D.
Affiliations: | Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD |
Google:
"Amber Sprenger"Mean distance: 18.03 (cluster 15) | S | N | B | C | P |
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
Kyllonen P, Hartman R, Sprenger A, et al. (2018) General fluid/inductive reasoning battery for a high-ability population. Behavior Research Methods |
Elson SB, Hartman R, Beatty A, et al. (2018) Critical Analytic Thinking Skills: Do They Predict Job-Related Task Performance Above and Beyond General Intelligence? Personnel Assessment and Decisions. 1 |
Atkins SM, Sprenger AM, Colflesh GJ, et al. (2014) Measuring working memory is all fun and games: a four-dimensional spatial game predicts cognitive task performance. Experimental Psychology. 61: 417-38 |
Sanborn AN, Hills TT, Dougherty MR, et al. (2014) Reply to Rouder (2014): good frequentist properties raise confidence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 21: 309-11 |
Yu EC, Sprenger AM, Thomas RP, et al. (2014) When decision heuristics and science collide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 21: 268-82 |
Kayes MK, Venezia AC, Sprenger AM, et al. (2014) Variability In Learning In Adults Explained By Cardiovascular Fitness, Physical Activity, And Apoe Genotype Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 46: 125-126 |
Sprenger AM, Atkins SM, Bolger DJ, et al. (2013) Training working memory: Limits of transfer Intelligence. 41: 638-663 |
Sprenger A, Dougherty MR. (2012) Generating and evaluating options for decision making: the impact of sequentially presented evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 38: 550-75 |
Sprenger AM, Dougherty MR, Atkins SM, et al. (2011) Implications of cognitive load for hypothesis generation and probability judgment. Frontiers in Psychology. 2: 129 |
Thomas RP, Dougherty MR, Sprenger AM, et al. (2008) Diagnostic hypothesis generation and human judgment. Psychological Review. 115: 155-85 |