Daniel L K Yamins, PhD
Affiliations: | Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA |
Area:
computational neuroscience, artificial intelligence, psychology, vision, auditionGoogle:
"Daniel Yamins"Mean distance: 14.62
Children
Sign in to add traineeHokyung Sung | research assistant | 2020-2022 | Stanford |
Tyler Bonnen | grad student | Stanford | |
Imran Thobani | grad student | Stanford | |
Aran Nayebi | grad student | 2016-2022 | Stanford |
Daniel M. Bear | post-doc | 2017- | Stanford |
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
Richards BA, Lillicrap TP, Beaudoin P, et al. (2019) A deep learning framework for neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience. 22: 1761-1770 |
Zhuang C, Yamins D. (2018) Using multiple optimization tasks to improve deep neural network models of higher ventral cortex Journal of Vision. 18: 905 |
Margalit E, Lee H, DiCarlo J, et al. (2018) Pinwheel-like Iso-Orientation Domains in a Convolutional Neural Network Model Journal of Vision. 18: 771 |
Wammes J, Fan J, Lee R, et al. (2018) Changing object representations during visual production training Journal of Vision. 18: 763 |
Nayebi A, Kubilius J, Bear D, et al. (2018) Convolutional recurrent neural network models of dynamics in higher visual cortex Journal of Vision. 18: 717 |
Haber N, Mrowca D, Fei-Fei L, et al. (2018) Modeling the scientist in the crib Journal of Vision. 18: 10 |
Zhuang C, Wang Y, Yamins D, et al. (2017) Deep Learning Predicts Correlation between a Functional Signature of Higher Visual Areas and Sparse Firing of Neurons. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. 11: 100 |
Fan J, Yamins D, Turk-Browne N. (2017) Visual production induces categorical perception Journal of Vision. 17: 992 |
Tian M, Yamins D, Grill-Spector K. (2016) Learning the 3-D structure of objects from 2-D views depends on shape, not format. Journal of Vision. 16: 7 |
Yamins DL, DiCarlo JJ. (2016) Eight open questions in the computational modeling of higher sensory cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 37: 114-120 |