Hilary Barth

Affiliations: 
Psychology; Neuroscience & Behavior Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT, United States 
Area:
cognitive development; numerical cognition
Google:
"Hilary Barth"
Mean distance: 13.59 (cluster 23)
 
SNBCP
BETA: Related publications

Publications

You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect.

Patalano AL, Zax A, Williams K, et al. (2020) Intuitive symbolic magnitude judgments and decision making under risk in adults. Cognitive Psychology. 118: 101273
Xing C, Paul J, Zax A, et al. (2019) Probability range and probability distortion in a gambling task. Acta Psychologica. 197: 39-51
Barth HC, Cordes S, Patalano AL. (2018) Suboptimality in perceptual decision making and beyond. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 41: e225
Reichelson S, Zax A, Patalano AL, et al. (2018) Author accepted manuscript: Partition dependence in development: Are children's decisions shaped by the arbitrary grouping of options? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006). 1747021818777720
Reichelson S, Zax A, Bass I, et al. (2017) Partition dependence in consumer choice: Perceptual groupings do not reliably shape decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Barth H, Slusser E, Kanjlia S, et al. (2015) How feedback improves children's numerical estimation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Schug MG, Shusterman A, Barth H, et al. (2015) Early Group Bias in the Faroe Islands: Cultural Variation in Children's Group-Based Reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006). 1-27
Patalano AL, Saltiel JR, Machlin L, et al. (2015) The role of numeracy and approximate number system acuity in predicting value and probability distortion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 22: 1820-9
Barth H, Lesser E, Taggart J, et al. (2014) Spatial estimation: a non-Bayesian alternative. Developmental Science
Barth H, Bhandari K, Garcia J, et al. (2014) Preschoolers trust novel members of accurate speakers' groups and judge them favourably. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006). 67: 872-83
See more...