Year |
Citation |
Score |
2017 |
Scherbaum CA, Black J, Weiner SP. With the Right Map, Survey Key Driver Analysis Can Help Get Organizations to the Right Destination Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 10: 290-298. DOI: 10.1017/Iop.2017.21 |
0.306 |
|
2015 |
Mellert LD, Scherbaum C, Oliveira J, Wilke B. Examining the relationship between organizational change and financial loss Journal of Organizational Change Management. 28: 59-71. DOI: 10.1108/Jocm-11-2013-0236 |
0.351 |
|
2015 |
Hanges PJ, Scherbaum CA, Reeve CL. There Are More Things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, Than DGF Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 8: 472-481. DOI: 10.1017/Iop.2015.65 |
0.409 |
|
2015 |
Scherbaum CA, Goldstein HW. Intelligence and the modern world of work Human Resource Management Review. 25: 1-3. DOI: 10.1016/J.Hrmr.2014.09.002 |
0.464 |
|
2013 |
Scherbaum CA, Sabet J, Kern MJ, Agnello P. Examining faking on personality inventories using unfolding item response theory models. Journal of Personality Assessment. 95: 207-16. PMID 23030769 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2012.725439 |
0.406 |
|
2013 |
Scherbaum CA, Meade AW. New directions for measurement in management research International Journal of Management Reviews. 15: 132-148. DOI: 10.1111/Ijmr.12003 |
0.398 |
|
2012 |
Hanges PJ, Scherbaum CA, Goldstein HW, Ryan R, Yusko KP. I-O Psychology and Intelligence: A Starting Point Established Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 5: 189-195. DOI: 10.1111/J.1754-9434.2012.01430.X |
0.396 |
|
2012 |
Scherbaum CA, Goldstein HW, Yusko KP, Ryan R, Hanges PJ. Intelligence 2.0: Reestablishing a Research Program on g in I-O Psychology Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 5: 128-148. DOI: 10.1111/J.1754-9434.2012.01419.X |
0.369 |
|
2011 |
Scherbaum CA, Saari LM. Identified Employee Surveys: Where Do We Go From Here? Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 4: 487-493. DOI: 10.1111/J.1754-9434.2011.01381.X |
0.334 |
|
2011 |
Saari LM, Scherbaum CA. Identified Employee Surveys: Potential Promise, Perils, and Professional Practice Guidelines Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 4: 435-448. DOI: 10.1111/J.1754-9434.2011.01369.X |
0.351 |
|
2011 |
Scherbaum CA, Blanshetyn V, Marshall-Wolp E, McCue E, Strauss R. Examining the effects of stereotype threat on test-taking behaviors Social Psychology of Education. 14: 361-375. DOI: 10.1007/S11218-011-9154-2 |
0.308 |
|
2010 |
Johnson JW, Steel P, Scherbaum CA, Hoffman CC, Jeanneret PR, Foster J. Validation Is Like Motor Oil: Synthetic Is Better Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 3: 305-328. DOI: 10.1111/J.1754-9434.2010.01245.X |
0.365 |
|
2010 |
Scherbaum CA, Vancouver JB. If we produce discrepancies, then how? Testing a computational process model of positive goal revision Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 40: 2201-2231. DOI: 10.1111/J.1559-1816.2010.00656.X |
0.4 |
|
2008 |
Scherbaum CA, Goldstein HW. Examining the Relationship Between Race-Based Differential Item Functioning and Item Difficulty: Educational and Psychological Measurement. 68: 537-553. DOI: 10.1177/0013164407310129 |
0.359 |
|
2008 |
Vancouver JB, Scherbaum CA. Do we self-regulate actions or perceptions? A test of two computational models Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory. 14: 1-22. DOI: 10.1007/S10588-008-9021-7 |
0.364 |
|
2006 |
Scherbaum CA, Cohen-Charash Y, Kern MJ. Measuring general self-efficacy: A comparison of three measures using item response theory Educational and Psychological Measurement. 66: 1047-1063. DOI: 10.1177/0013164406288171 |
0.311 |
|
2006 |
Scherbaum CA, Finlinson S, Barden K, Tamanini K. Applications of item response theory to measurement issues in leadership research Leadership Quarterly. 17: 366-386. DOI: 10.1016/J.Leaqua.2006.04.005 |
0.421 |
|
2005 |
Vancouver JB, Putka DJ, Scherbaum CA. Testing a computational model of the goal-level effect: An example of a neglected methodology Organizational Research Methods. 8: 100-127. DOI: 10.1177/1094428104271998 |
0.41 |
|
2005 |
Scherbaum CA. Synthetic Validity: Past, Present, And Future Personnel Psychology. 58: 481-515. DOI: 10.1111/J.1744-6570.2005.00547.X |
0.39 |
|
Show low-probability matches. |