☰

Kevin R. Murphy - Publications

Affiliations: 
New York University, New York, NY, United States 
Tree Info Grants Similar researchers Related pubs Distance to... Nearest Nobel PubMed Report error

14 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2013 Murphy KR, Deckert PJ, Kinney TB, Kung MC. Subject Matter Expert Judgments Regarding the Relative Importance of Competencies are not Useful for Choosing the Test Batteries that Best Predict Performance International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 21: 419-429. DOI: 10.1111/ijsa.12051  0.392
2009 Murphy KR, Dzieweczynski JL, Zhang Y. Positive manifold limits the relevance of content-matching strategies for validating selection test batteries. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 94: 1018-31. PMID 19594241 DOI: 10.1037/A0014075  0.558
2009 Murphy KR. Is Content-Related Evidence Useful in Validating Selection Tests? Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 2: 517-526. DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01186.x  0.311
2009 Murphy KR. Content Validation Is Useful for Many Things, but Validity Isn't One of Them Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 2: 453-464. DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01173.x  0.347
1998 Tziner A, Murphy KR, Cleveland JN, Beaudin G, Marchand S. Impact of rater beliefs regarding performance appraisal and its organizational context on appraisal quality Journal of Business and Psychology. 12: 457-467. DOI: 10.1023/A:1025003106150  0.304
1997 MURPHY KR, SHIARELLA AH. IMPLICATIONS OF THE MULTIDIMENSIONAL NATURE OF JOB PERFORMANCE FOR THE VALIDITY OF SELECTION TESTS: MULTIVARIATE FRAMEWORKS FOR STUDYING TEST VALIDITY Personnel Psychology. 50: 823-854. DOI: 10.1111/J.1744-6570.1997.TB01484.X  0.34
1989 Murphy KR, Balzer WK. Rater errors and rating accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology. 74: 619-624. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.619  0.613
1989 Murphy KR, Philbin TA, Adams SR. Effect of purpose of observation on accuracy of immediate and delayed performance ratings Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 43: 336-354. DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(89)90042-3  0.322
1986 Murphy KR, Gannett BA, Herr BM, Chen JA. Effects of Subsequent Performance on Evaluations of Previous Performance Journal of Applied Psychology. 71: 427-431. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.427  0.315
1986 Murphy KR, Balzer WK. Systematic Distortions in Memory-Based Behavior Ratings and Performance Evaluations. Consequences for Rating Accuracy Journal of Applied Psychology. 71: 39-44. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.71.1.39  0.642
1985 Murphy KR, Balzer WK, Lockhart MC, Eisenman EJ. Effects of Previous Performance on Evaluations of Present Performance Journal of Applied Psychology. 70: 72-84. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.70.1.72  0.665
1984 Murphy KR, Kellam KL, Balzer WK, Armstrong JG. Effects of the purpose of rating on accuracy in observing teacher behavior and evaluating teaching performance Journal of Educational Psychology. 76: 45-54. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.76.1.45  0.65
1983 Balzer WK, Rohrbaugh J, Murphy KR. Reliability of actual and predicted judgments across time Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 32: 109-123. DOI: 10.1016/0030-5073(83)90142-3  0.651
1982 Murphy KR, Garcia M, Kerkar S, Martin C, Balzer WK. Relationship between observational accuracy and accuracy in evaluating performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. 67: 320-325. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.67.3.320  0.629
Show low-probability matches.