| Year |
Citation |
Score |
| 2023 |
Veldre A, Reichle ED, Yu L, Andrews S. Lexical processing across the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 49: 649-671. PMID 37261772 DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001109 |
0.457 |
|
| 2022 |
Wong R, Veldre A, Andrews S. Are there independent effects of constraint and predictability on eye movements during reading? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. PMID 36521159 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001206 |
0.377 |
|
| 2022 |
Andrews S, Veldre A, Wong R, Yu L, Reichle ED. How do task demands and aging affect lexical prediction during online reading of natural texts? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. PMID 36521158 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001200 |
0.35 |
|
| 2022 |
Xiong J, Yu L, Veldre A, Reichle ED, Andrews S. A multitask comparison of word- and character-frequency effects in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. PMID 36326651 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001192 |
0.436 |
|
| 2022 |
Veldre A, Reichle ED, Yu L, Andrews S. Understanding the visual constraints on lexical processing: New empirical and simulation results. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General. PMID 36107696 DOI: 10.1037/xge0001295 |
0.373 |
|
| 2021 |
Veldre A, Wong R, Andrews S. Predictability effects and parafoveal processing in older readers. Psychology and Aging. PMID 34843330 DOI: 10.1037/pag0000659 |
0.374 |
|
| 2021 |
Dann KM, Veldre A, Andrews S. Morphological preview effects in English are restricted to suffixed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. PMID 34014756 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001029 |
0.468 |
|
| 2021 |
Harris IM, Hayward WG, Seet MS, Andrews S. Repetition blindness for words and pictures: A failure to form stable type representations? Memory & Cognition. PMID 33675001 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-021-01146-5 |
0.444 |
|
| 2020 |
Veldre A, Wong R, Andrews S. Reading proficiency predicts the extent of the right, but not left, perceptual span in older readers. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. PMID 33155127 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02185-x |
0.359 |
|
| 2020 |
Xu Y, Wong R, He S, Veldre A, Andrews S. Is it smart to read on your phone? The impact of reading format and culture on the continued influence of misinformation. Memory & Cognition. PMID 32430888 DOI: 10.3758/S13421-020-01046-0 |
0.395 |
|
| 2020 |
Andrews S, Veldre A, Clarke IE. Measuring Lexical Quality: The Role of Spelling Ability. Behavior Research Methods. PMID 32291733 DOI: 10.3758/S13428-020-01387-3 |
0.483 |
|
| 2020 |
Veldre A, Reichle ED, Wong R, Andrews S. The effect of contextual plausibility on word skipping during reading. Cognition. 197: 104184. PMID 31954289 DOI: 10.1016/J.Cognition.2020.104184 |
0.536 |
|
| 2019 |
Drieghe D, Veldre A, Fitzsimmons G, Ashby J, Andrews S. The influence of number of syllables on word skipping during reading revisited. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. PMID 30877634 DOI: 10.3758/S13423-019-01590-0 |
0.551 |
|
| 2019 |
Seet MS, Andrews S, Harris IM. Semantic repetition blindness and associative facilitation in the identification of stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation. Memory & Cognition. PMID 30725378 DOI: 10.3758/S13421-019-00905-9 |
0.529 |
|
| 2019 |
Andrews S, Veldre A. What is the most plausible account of the role of parafoveal processing in reading Language and Linguistics Compass. 13. DOI: 10.1111/Lnc3.12344 |
0.388 |
|
| 2018 |
Howard CJ, Uttley J, Andrews S. Team ball sport participation is associated with performance in two sustained visual attention tasks: Position monitoring and target identification in rapid serial visual presentation streams. Progress in Brain Research. 240: 53-69. PMID 30390841 DOI: 10.1016/Bs.Pbr.2018.09.001 |
0.348 |
|
| 2018 |
Veldre A, Andrews S. How does foveal processing difficulty affect parafoveal processing during reading Journal of Memory and Language. 103: 74-90. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jml.2018.08.001 |
0.527 |
|
| 2018 |
Veldre A, Andrews S. Beyond cloze probability: Parafoveal processing of semantic and syntactic information during reading Journal of Memory and Language. 100: 1-17. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jml.2017.12.002 |
0.537 |
|
| 2017 |
Veldre A, Drieghe D, Andrews S. Spelling ability selectively predicts the magnitude of disruption in unspaced text reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 43: 1612-1628. PMID 28414501 DOI: 10.1037/Xhp0000425 |
0.551 |
|
| 2017 |
Andrews S, Lo S, Xia V. Individual Differences in Automatic Semantic Priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. PMID 28263630 DOI: 10.1037/Xhp0000372 |
0.528 |
|
| 2016 |
Veldre A, Andrews S. Parafoveal preview effects depend on both preview plausibility and target predictability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006). 1-12. PMID 27734767 DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1247894 |
0.49 |
|
| 2016 |
Goldzieher MJ, Andrews S, Harris IM. Two scenes or not two scenes: The effects of stimulus repetition and view-similarity on scene categorization from brief displays. Memory & Cognition. PMID 27496025 DOI: 10.3758/S13421-016-0640-9 |
0.397 |
|
| 2016 |
Veldre A, Andrews S. Parafoveal preview benefit in sentence reading: Independent effects of plausibility and orthographic relatedness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. PMID 27418260 DOI: 10.3758/S13423-016-1120-8 |
0.513 |
|
| 2016 |
Andrews S, Burton AM, Schweinberger SR, Wiese H. Event-related potentials reveal the development of stable face representations from natural variability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006). 1-35. PMID 27252094 DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1195851 |
0.327 |
|
| 2016 |
Veldre A, Andrews S. Is semantic preview benefit due to relatedness or plausibility? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 42: 939-52. PMID 26752734 DOI: 10.1037/Xhp0000200 |
0.553 |
|
| 2015 |
Veldre A, Andrews S. Semantic Preview Benefit in English: Individual Differences in the Extraction and Use of Parafoveal Semantic Information. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. PMID 26595070 DOI: 10.1037/Xlm0000212 |
0.51 |
|
| 2015 |
Harris IM, Wong C, Andrews S. Visual field asymmetries in object individuation. Consciousness and Cognition. 37: 194-206. PMID 26433638 DOI: 10.1016/J.Concog.2015.09.004 |
0.345 |
|
| 2015 |
Lo S, Andrews S. To transform or not to transform: using generalized linear mixed models to analyse reaction time data. Frontiers in Psychology. 6: 1171. PMID 26300841 DOI: 10.3389/Fpsyg.2015.01171 |
0.318 |
|
| 2015 |
Andrews S, Jenkins R, Cursiter H, Burton AM. Telling faces together: Learning new faces through exposure to multiple instances. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006). 1-10. PMID 25607814 DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.1003949 |
0.334 |
|
| 2015 |
Veldre A, Andrews S. Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers' lexical representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 41: 219-32. PMID 25384238 DOI: 10.1037/Xhp0000017 |
0.555 |
|
| 2015 |
Veldre A, Andrews S. Parafoveal lexical activation depends on skilled reading proficiency. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 41: 586-95. PMID 25068856 DOI: 10.1037/Xlm0000039 |
0.535 |
|
| 2015 |
Xia V, Andrews S. Masked translation priming asymmetry in Chinese-English bilinguals: making sense of the Sense Model. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006). 68: 294-325. PMID 25014131 DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.944195 |
0.373 |
|
| 2014 |
Veldre A, Andrews S. Lexical quality and eye movements: Individual differences in the perceptual span of skilled adult readers Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 67: 703-727. PMID 23972214 DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.826258 |
0.508 |
|
| 2013 |
Andrews S, Lo S. Is morphological priming stronger for transparent than opaque words? It depends on individual differences in spelling and vocabulary Journal of Memory and Language. 68: 279-296. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jml.2012.12.001 |
0.479 |
|
| 2012 |
Andrews S, Lo S. Not all skilled readers have cracked the code: individual differences in masked form priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 38: 152-63. PMID 21875252 DOI: 10.1037/A0024953 |
0.521 |
|
| 2012 |
Hersch J, Andrews S. Lexical Quality and Reading Skill: Bottom-Up and Top-Down Contributions to Sentence Processing Scientific Studies of Reading. 16: 240-262. DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2011.564244 |
0.531 |
|
| 2010 |
Andrews S, Hersch J. Lexical Precision in Skilled Readers: Individual Differences in Masked Neighbor Priming Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 139: 299-318. PMID 20438253 DOI: 10.1037/A0018366 |
0.543 |
|
| 2009 |
Andrews S, Bond R. Lexical expertise and reading skill: bottom-up and top-down processing of lexical ambiguity Reading and Writing. 22: 687-711. DOI: 10.1007/S11145-008-9137-7 |
0.522 |
|
| 2008 |
Newell BR, Cavenett T, Andrews S. On the immunity of perceptual implicit memory to manipulations of attention. Memory & Cognition. 36: 725-34. PMID 18604956 DOI: 10.3758/Mc.36.4.725 |
0.495 |
|
| 2008 |
Bond R, Andrews S. Repetition blindness in sentence contexts: not just an attribution? Memory & Cognition. 36: 295-313. PMID 18426062 DOI: 10.3758/Mc.36.2.295 |
0.556 |
|
| 2008 |
Andrews S. Lexical Expertise and Reading Skill Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory. 49: 247-281. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)00007-8 |
0.563 |
|
| 2006 |
Anstey KJ, Butterworth P, Borzycki M, Andrews S. Between- and within-individual effects of visual contrast sensitivity on perceptual matching, processing speed, and associative memory in older adults. Gerontology. 52: 124-30. PMID 16508320 DOI: 10.1159/000090958 |
0.302 |
|
| 2005 |
Drobny JV, Anstey KJ, Andrews S. Visual memory testing in older adults with age-related visual decline: a measure of memory performance or visual functioning? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 27: 425-35. PMID 15962689 DOI: 10.1080/138033990520241 |
0.304 |
|
| 2005 |
Andrews S, Woollams A, Bond R. Spelling-sound typicality only affects words with digraphs: Further qualifications to the generality of the regularity effect on word naming. Journal of Memory and Language. 53: 567-593. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jml.2005.04.002 |
0.527 |
|
| 2004 |
Newell BR, Andrews S. Levels of processing effects on implicit and explicit memory tasks: using question position to investigate the lexical-processing hypothesis. Experimental Psychology. 51: 132-44. PMID 15114906 DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.51.2.132 |
0.42 |
|
| 2004 |
Andrews S, Miller B, Rayner K. Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 16: 285-311. DOI: 10.1080/09541440340000123 |
0.439 |
|
| 2003 |
Andrews S. E-Z Reader's assumptions about lexical processing: Not so easy to define the two stages of word identification? Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 26: 477-478. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X03220100 |
0.383 |
|
| 2002 |
Anstey KJ, Dain S, Andrews S, Drobny J. Visual Abilities in Older Adults Explain Age-Differences in Stroop and Fluid Intelligence but Not Face Recognition: Implications for the Vision-Cognition Connection Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition. 9: 253-265. DOI: 10.1076/Anec.9.4.253.8770 |
0.305 |
|
| 1998 |
Andrews S, Scarratt DR. Rule and analogy mechanisms in reading nonwords: Hough dou peapel rede gnew wirds? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 24: 1052-1086. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.4.1052 |
0.391 |
|
| 1992 |
Andrews S. Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 18: 234-254. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.18.2.234 |
0.441 |
|
| Show low-probability matches. |