Laurel J. Buxbaum - US grants
Affiliations: | Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, United States |
Area:
cognition and action, action semantics, neglect, apraxia, optic ataxia, object knowledge, plans for actionWe are testing a new system for linking grants to scientists.
The funding information displayed below comes from the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools and the NSF Award Database.The grant data on this page is limited to grants awarded in the United States and is thus partial. It can nonetheless be used to understand how funding patterns influence mentorship networks and vice-versa, which has deep implications on how research is done.
You can help! If you notice any innacuracies, please sign in and mark grants as correct or incorrect matches.
High-probability grants
According to our matching algorithm, Laurel J. Buxbaum is the likely recipient of the following grants.Years | Recipients | Code | Title / Keywords | Matching score |
---|---|---|---|---|
1997 — 2001 | Buxbaum, Laurel J | R29Activity Code Description: Undocumented code - click on the grant title for more information. |
Spatial and Nonspatial Factors in Selection For Action @ Moss Rehabilitation Hospital DESCRIPTION: (Adapted From The Investigator's Abstract): An extensive literature suggests that speed and accuracy of detection of a target object in an array of other objects (distractors) is a function of the locations of target and distractor objects and the visual and semantic characteristics of these objects. Recent evidence for control subjects and patients with frontal and parietal lesions suggests that response factors (such as whether the task requires a button press or target-touch response) may also critically influence performance on such tasks. On the basis of such data, as well as findings from physiological studies, we have developed a provisional model of the role of distinct fronto-parietal processing modules in location coding and "selection for action". This model predicts differing roles for spatial, object, and response factors in selection as a function of the integrity of each of the proposed processing modules. A major goal of this research program is to test whether the predictions of the model are borne out in the performance of patients with perceptual neglect, directional hypokinesic neglect, and optic ataxia, whose lesions are hypothesized to affect different modules. The proposed experimental program will center upon selective reaching tasks, and will culminate in a series of studies of real-object detection and prehension designed to have greater relevance to naturalistic action than do most traditional laboratory studies of visual attention. In addition to contributing to the understanding of normal and disordered percept-motor processing, data from these studies are expected to provide evidence bearing on the real-life action performance of patients with such disorders, and thus, to have clinical implications for assessment and treatment. |
0.972 |
2003 — 2006 | Buxbaum, Laurel J | R01Activity Code Description: To support a discrete, specified, circumscribed project to be performed by the named investigator(s) in an area representing his or her specific interest and competencies. |
Cognitive and Spatial Systems in Action @ Albert Einstein Healthcare Network [unreadable] DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The distinction between a ventral visual processing stream devoted to processing object identity and a dorsal stream coding object location and body movements guides two decades of research in perception and action. A number of lines of evidence, including work from our laboratory, suggest that the model requires refinement. This work described in this proposal has two general aims. The first is to develop a model of the action system within a computational framework. The model includes two anatomically and functionally distinct components: the action representation system, mediated by the inferior parietal lobe, and the action execution system, mediated by dorsal stream structures in fronto-parietal cortex. The second general aim is to reconcile a major clinical syndrome, ideomotor apraxia (IM), with recent advances in the cognitive neuroscientific study of action. There are four specific aims. First, we will relate the diverse presentation of IM to the two components of the action system by evaluating a two-subtype model of lM. Second, through study of patients with IM, we will assess the distinction between two types of spatial coding of body position and body movement information. Third, we will assess the roles of objects in performing skilled movements, and the distinctions between object representations used in different contexts. Finally, we will elucidate internal models of movement used in programming actions. The proposed program of research is expected to continue to contribute to our understanding of the relationship of distinct representational and dynamic processing modules in normal and disordered action, and the neuroanatomic substrate for these processes. In addition, it is expected to significantly advance our understanding of lM, a common clinical disorder whose presentation, subtypes, and neuroanatomic substrate remain poorly understood. [unreadable] [unreadable] |
0.913 |
2010 — 2014 | Buxbaum, Laurel J | R01Activity Code Description: To support a discrete, specified, circumscribed project to be performed by the named investigator(s) in an area representing his or her specific interest and competencies. |
Understanding the Conceptual-Motor Interface @ Albert Einstein Healthcare Network DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): An emerging movement within cognitive neuroscience posits that many cognitive processes are a product of goal-directed interactions between actors and environments. A complementary view is the theory of "motor facilitation", which maintains that viewing an object activates the appropriate movements for interacting with it. Thus hypothesized is a strong bi-directional link between conceptual representations of objects and goal- directed actions. Due in part to the novelty of this area of investigation, relevant theories are for the most part highly unconstrained. This proposal makes use of our conceptual model of object-related actions, the 2 Action System model, to frame a theoretically- driven set of predictions that will be tested in an interdigitated series of studies with patients with stroke and cortico-basal ganglionic degeneration syndrome, both of whom exhibit high-level action disorders, healthy subjects, detailed neuroimaging analyses, and transcranial magnetic stimulation. One of the critical hypotheses to be tested is that different types of action representations may be activated under different task demands, with differing predicted time courses, and based upon distinct neuroanatomic substrates. Also to be tested are predictions related to a hypothesized set of constraints on the relationship of motor competence and conceptual organization. Finally, several experiments will relate individual differences in the current status of the motor system, and underlying integrity of brain structures involved in motor planning and execution, to a) activation of previously-existing, natural conceptual representations and b) the ability to develop artificial conceptual object and action representations. These studies will test the hypothesis that the competence of the motor system has highly circumscribed and predicted relevance for both natural concept retrieval as well as artificial concept learning. The proposed work is expected to have broad significance for theories of "selection for action" and "embodied cognition", as well as for accounts of higher-level disorders of motor control. Specifically, the proposed work will 1) provide critical constraints on the contexts in which bidirectional links are observed at the conceptual- motor interface, 2) elucidate the precise representational structure and time-course of activation of object and action representations, 3) anchor relevant constructs in a detailed cognitive-neuroanatomic model, and 4) clarify the nature of conceptual-motor impairments of patients with high-level (cognitive) action disorders. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: The proposal describes a series of studies with neurological patients and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) having broad significance for our understanding of clinical disorders of object-related action (apraxias). These disorders are extremely common and disabling in both stroke and degenerative dementia, yet have been the subject of comparatively little research. The proposed experiments will focus on clarifying the mechanisms and interactions of neural systems responsible for coding different types of object-related action, and are a critical missing step in the design of theoretically and empirically informed approaches to treatment. |
0.913 |
2016 — 2020 | Buxbaum, Laurel J | R01Activity Code Description: To support a discrete, specified, circumscribed project to be performed by the named investigator(s) in an area representing his or her specific interest and competencies. |
Understanding Action Selection in the Tool Use Network @ Albert Einstein Healthcare Network Project Summary: Skilled use of tools is a defining achievement of human cognition, and is enabled by the storage of tool-specific action memories. Many tools are associated with more than one action, and most everyday tasks are associated with more than one tool. Limb apraxia is a common, disabling, and puzzling left-hemisphere disorder characterized by prominent deficits in activating and selecting task-appropriate tool actions. Little is known about the cognitive mechanisms and brain regions enabling such selection in the neurologically intact brain, or how these processes go awry in apraxia. In several other cognitive domains, it has been suggested that appropriate response selection occurs via biased competition?that is, the prioritization of competing incoming information to enable appropriate response selection. Capitalizing on the promise of such frameworks, we have developed a new functional-neuroanatomic model of biased competition in a specific left hemisphere Tool Use network. Called ?Two Action Systems Plus? (2AS+), the model generates testable hypotheses about the major principles determining tool action selection, and their deficiencies in apraxia. Specifically, we hypothesize that 1) Competition between tool actions is influenced by the graded similarity of tool action representations, as implemented primarily by the left posterior temporal cortex (pTC), 2) The outcome of the competitive process is affected by the strength and timing of activation of tool action representations, and depends on the dynamic interplay of left pTC and the parietal lobes, 3) Outcome is further influenced by a mechanism that biases competition towards the tool action that is appropriate to goals and context, as implemented by the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and its connections with the supramarginal gyrus (SMG), and 4) There are two subtypes of apraxia characterized by distinct failures in the competitive selection process: an anterior subtype characterized by inability to appropriately resolve tool action competition, and a posterior subtype reflecting weakened competition. These hypotheses will be tested using a number of complementary methods with healthy and brain-lesioned participants, including voxel-based lesion symptom mapping, resting functional connectivity, fMRI with multi-voxel pattern analyses, and eyetracking. By specifying when and how visuomotor information plays a role in tool representations, the proposed experiments promise to critically constrain ?embodied? cognition theories claiming that tools automatically evoke their actions. The proposed research will also advance the theoretical understanding of tool action by anchoring relevant constructs in a cognitive-neuroanatomic model, clarify how action representations are organized and activated, and improve our understanding of the mechanisms affecting errors and re-learning in apraxia, with implications for rehabilitation. |
0.913 |
2021 | Buxbaum, Laurel J Coslett, H Branch |
R01Activity Code Description: To support a discrete, specified, circumscribed project to be performed by the named investigator(s) in an area representing his or her specific interest and competencies. |
Efficacy and Mechanisms of Virtual Reality Treatment of Phantom Leg Pain @ Albert Einstein Healthcare Network Project Summary Limb loss due to amputation is a common problem, occurring in nearly 2 million people in the US. Approximately 90% of individuals with limb amputation experience the persistent sensation of the missing extremity, known as a phantom limb, and up to 85% experience persistent and debilitating pain in the missing limb, termed phantom limb pain (hereafter PLP). We previously demonstrated that Virtual Reality (VR) with active leg movements and vision of a virtual limb significantly reduce phantom limb pain in subjects with below the knee amputations. The work proposed here has several objectives. In Specific Aim 1 we will randomize 40 subjects with PLP to treatment with our Active VR or a commercially available VR pain treatment (Cool!). In Specific Aim 2 we propose to develop a home intervention for PLP using the intervention (Active VR or Cool!) that in Specific Aim 1 proved to be most efficacious. In specific Aim 3 we will obtain multimodal ultra-high resolution (7T) MRI imaging in subjects with PLP before and after treatment, and normal subjects without amputation; we will also attempt to develop imaging biomarkers that predict efficacy of treatment. Imaging studies will address a number of controversies regarding the neural basis of PLP and explore human neuroplasticity more generally. Finally, in Specific Aim 4 we propose to determine factors that could be used in a clinical biomarker-based algorithm to predict response to home-based VR treatment. Using classification and regression tree (CART) analysis with the data from Aim 2, we will identify behavioral and neuroanatomic factors that predict treatment response. By the end of the grant period, we will have determined the relative efficacy of two VR treatments for PLP, assessed the feasibility and efficacy of a low-cost home-based treatment, determined the neuroanatomic changes associated with treatment response using advanced methods, and explored the behavioral and neuroimaging biomarkers predicting treatment response. These data will provide a critical step toward clinical implementation of a VR treatment protocol for PLP and will advance theoretical understanding of the mechanisms and functional neuroanatomy of PLP. |
0.913 |