Dmitry Taubinsky, Ph.D.
Affiliations: | Business Economics | Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States |
Area:
EconomicsGoogle:
"Dmitry Taubinsky"Mean distance: 8014.95
Parents
Sign in to add mentor| David Laibson | grad student | 2014 | Harvard | |
| (Essays in Behavioral and Experimental Economics.) | ||||
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
|
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
| Bronchetti ET, Kessler JB, Magenheim EB, et al. (2020) Is Attention Produced Rationally National Bureau of Economic Research |
| Morrison W, Taubinsky D. (2019) Rules of Thumb and Attention Elasticities: Evidence from Under- and Overreaction to Taxes National Bureau of Economic Research |
| Carrera M, Royer H, Stehr M, et al. (2019) How are Preferences For Commitment Revealed National Bureau of Economic Research |
| Allcott H, Lockwood BB, Taubinsky D. (2019) Should We Tax Sugar-Sweetened Beverages? An Overview of Theory and Evidence Journal of Economic Perspectives. 33: 202-227 |
| Allcott H, Lockwood BB, Taubinsky D. (2019) Regressive Sin Taxes, with an Application to the Optimal Soda Tax* The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 134: 1557-1626 |
| Carrera M, Royer H, Stehr M, et al. (2018) The limits of simple implementation intentions: Evidence from a field experiment on making plans to exercise. Journal of Health Economics. 62: 95-104 |
| Allcott H, Lockwood B, Taubinsky D. (2018) Ramsey Strikes Back: Optimal Commodity Taxes and Redistribution in the Presence of Salience Effects National Bureau of Economic Research. 108: 88-92 |
| Rees-Jones A, Taubinsky D. (2018) Taxing Humans: Pitfalls of the Mechanism Design Approach and Potential Resolutions Tax Policy and the Economy. 32: 107-133 |
| Bernheim BD, Taubinsky D. (2018) Behavioral Public Economics National Bureau of Economic Research. 1: 381-516 |
| Taubinsky D, Rees-Jones A. (2017) Attention Variation and Welfare: Theory and Evidence from a Tax Salience Experiment The Review of Economic Studies. 85: 2462-2496 |