Nathaniel Beck - Publications

Affiliations: 
Politics New York University, New York, NY, United States 
Area:
General

30 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2020 Beck N. Estimating Grouped Data Models with a Binary-Dependent Variable and Fixed Effects via a Logit versus a Linear Probability Model: The Impact of Dropped Units Political Analysis. 28: 139-145. DOI: 10.1017/Pan.2019.20  0.312
2011 Beck N, Katz JN. Modeling dynamics in time-series-cross-section political economy data Annual Review of Political Science. 14: 331-352. DOI: 10.1146/Annurev-Polisci-071510-103222  0.42
2011 Beck N. Of fixed-effects and time-invariant variables Political Analysis. 19: 119-122. DOI: 10.1093/Pan/Mpr010  0.39
2010 Beck N. Causal process "observation": Oxymoron or (fine) old wine Political Analysis. 18: 499-505. DOI: 10.1093/Pan/Mpq023  0.334
2010 Beck N. Time is not a theoretical variable Political Analysis. 18: 293-294. DOI: 10.1093/Pan/Mpq012  0.339
2007 Beck N. From statistical nuisances to serious modeling: Changing how we think about the analysis of time-series-cross-section data Political Analysis. 15: 97-100. DOI: 10.1093/Pan/Mpm001  0.416
2007 Beck N, Katz JN. Random coefficient models for time-series-cross-section data: Monte Carlo experiments Political Analysis. 15: 182-195. DOI: 10.1093/Pan/Mpl001  0.357
2006 BECK N, GLEDITSCH KS, BEARDSLEY K. Space Is More than Geography: Using Spatial Econometrics in the Study of Political Economy International Studies Quarterly. 50: 27-44. DOI: 10.1111/J.1468-2478.2006.00391.X  0.349
2006 Beck N. Is causal-process observation an oxymoron? Political Analysis. 14: 347-352. DOI: 10.1093/Pan/Mpj015  0.313
2006 Beck N, Katz JN. 8. Nathaniel Beck and Jonathan N. Katz. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data.” American Political Science Review 89 (September): 634–47 Cited 398 times. American Political Science Review. 100: 676-677. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055406292566  0.42
2004 BECK N, KING G, ZENG L. Theory and Evidence in International Conflict: A Response to de Marchi, Gelpi, and Grynaviski American Political Science Review. 98: 379-389. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055404001212  0.338
2001 Beck N, Katz JN. Throwing out the baby with the bath water: A comment on Green, Kim, and Yoon International Organization. 55: 487-495. DOI: 10.1162/00208180151140658  0.337
2001 Beck N. Time-series - Cross-section data: What have we learned in the past few years? Annual Review of Political Science. 4: 271-293. DOI: 10.1146/Annurev.Polisci.4.1.271  0.434
2001 Beck N. Time‐series–cross‐section Data Statistica Neerlandica. 55: 111-133. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9574.00161  0.428
2000 Beck N, King G, Zeng L. Improving Quantitative Studies of International Conflict: A Conjecture American Political Science Review. 94: 21-35. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055400220078  0.353
1998 Beck N, Katz JN, Tucker R. Taking time seriously: Time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable American Journal of Political Science. 42: 1260-1288. DOI: 10.2307/2991857  0.406
1998 Beck N, Jackman S. Beyond linearity by default: Generalized additive models American Journal of Political Science. 42: 596-627. DOI: 10.2307/2991772  0.389
1996 Beck N, Katz JN. Nuisance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series-Cross-Section Models Political Analysis. 6: 1-36. DOI: 10.1093/Pan/6.1.1  0.377
1995 Beck N, Katz JN. What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data American Political Science Review. 89: 634-647. DOI: 10.2307/2082979  0.321
1993 Beck N, Katz JN, Alvarez RM, Garrett G, Lange P. Government Partisanship, Labor Organization, and Macroeconomic Performance: A Corrigendum American Political Science Review. 87: 945-948. DOI: 10.2307/2938825  0.396
1992 Beck N. The methodology of cointegration Political Analysis. 4: 237-247. DOI: 10.1093/Pan/4.1.237  0.376
1991 Beck N. The Illusion of Cycles in International Relations International Studies Quarterly. 35: 455-476. DOI: 10.2307/2600950  0.308
1991 Beck N. The Fed And The Political Business Cycle Contemporary Economic Policy. 9: 25-38. DOI: 10.1111/J.1465-7287.1991.Tb00311.X  0.367
1991 Beck N. Comparing dynamic specifications: The case of presidential approval Political Analysis. 3: 51-87. DOI: 10.1093/Pan/3.1.51  0.356
1989 Beck N. Estimating dynamic models using kalman filtering Political Analysis. 1: 121-156. DOI: 10.1093/Pan/1.1.121  0.321
1987 Beck N. Elections and the Fed: Is There a Political Monetary Cycle?* American Journal of Political Science. 31: 194. DOI: 10.2307/2111330  0.393
1984 Beck N. Domestic Political Sources of American Monetary Policy: 1955–82 The Journal of Politics. 46: 786-817. DOI: 10.2307/2130856  0.365
1982 Beck N. Presidential Influence on the Federal Reserve in the 1970’s American Journal of Political Science. 26: 415. DOI: 10.2307/2110936  0.341
1982 Beck N. Parties, Administrations, and American Macroeconomic Outcomes American Political Science Review. 76: 83-93. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055400186058  0.358
1982 Beck N. Does there exist a political business cycle: A Box-Tiao analysis Public Choice. 38: 205-209. DOI: 10.1007/Bf00127721  0.379
Show low-probability matches.