Thomas Wasow - US grants
Affiliations: | Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA |
Area:
language, psycholinguistics, syntaxWebsite:
http://www.stanford.edu/~wasow/We are testing a new system for linking grants to scientists.
The funding information displayed below comes from the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools and the NSF Award Database.The grant data on this page is limited to grants awarded in the United States and is thus partial. It can nonetheless be used to understand how funding patterns influence mentorship networks and vice-versa, which has deep implications on how research is done.
You can help! If you notice any innacuracies, please sign in and mark grants as correct or incorrect matches.
High-probability grants
According to our matching algorithm, Thomas Wasow is the likely recipient of the following grants.Years | Recipients | Code | Title / Keywords | Matching score |
---|---|---|---|---|
1981 — 1983 | Wasow, Thomas Sag, Ivan [⬀] |
N/AActivity Code Description: No activity code was retrieved: click on the grant title for more information |
Phrase Structure Grammar and Natural Language @ Stanford University |
1 |
1983 — 1986 | Wasow, Thomas Sag, Ivan [⬀] |
N/AActivity Code Description: No activity code was retrieved: click on the grant title for more information |
Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar @ Stanford University |
1 |
1985 — 1989 | Wasow, Thomas Sag, Ivan (co-PI) [⬀] |
N/AActivity Code Description: No activity code was retrieved: click on the grant title for more information |
@ Stanford University This project in linguistic theory is investigating the possibilities and problems of an explicit theory of linguistic syntax and semantics which operates on a single level of representation, with rules with strictly defined and restricted formal properties. The basic research focuses upon a set of interrelated issues in the areas of syntax, semantics, and pragmatics. The first set has to do with how information about syntactic dependencies determines surface order and (more generally) with characterizing the combinatorial possibilities available to natural language in formal and computational terms. The second set of issues concerns the representation of the syntactic dependencies that arise in natural language. The goals of the project with respect to semantics are to articulate the logical and ontological foundations of a theory which makes computational constructions out of mental entities. |
1 |
1993 — 1997 | Wasow, Thomas Clark, Herbert [⬀] |
N/AActivity Code Description: No activity code was retrieved: click on the grant title for more information |
Temporal Processes in Language Use @ Stanford University 9309612 Clark Language use in everyday discourse is a joint activity. Speakers and their addressees coordinate closely with each other as speakers try to attend to, identify, understand, and take up what they say. This project is about one level of that process: how speakers formulate and present utterances for their addressees in real time. The problem is that time moves inexorably onward, and speakers often cannot formulate their utterances in the time available. This lads to disfluences (pauses, uh, self-corrections, repeats, restarts, etc.). It also leads to the ordering of phrases based on how heavy, or complex, they are. The goal is to develop a model of formulation and presentation that accounts for these phenomena. The project contains five series of studies. Series 1 will examine disfluences in a large corpus of spontaneous English conversation. One study will look at how speakers choose the ("thee") over the (thuh) to forecast problems in formulating noun phrases. Another will investigate the contrasting problems that marked by uh and um. A third will examine when and why speakers repeat words as in "and uh there's no point in.in doing that," and a fourth, when and why they stretch words. A fifth will compare monologues and dialogues for number and types of disfluencies. Series 2 will use experiments to examine the disfluencies speakers produce in difficult situations. One experiment will examine the pattern of disfluences that arises as speakers formulate complicated descriptions. A second and third experiment will investigate the temporal details of how speakers manage interruptions caused either by side-tracking or by bursts of noise. A fourth will compare speakers strategies in presenting utterances in face-to-face and telephone conversations. Series 3 will investigate the logic that underlies spontaneous repairs of speech. Precisely how do repairs work when speakers replace one word or phrase with another? Several alternative models will be tested against a large corpus of repairs from spontaneous talk. One study will examine the function of self-talk--when speakers interrupt their utterances apparently to address themselves. Series 4 is based on the idea that many disfluences aren't a nuisance to listeners, as ordinarily assumed, but a help. One study will examine experimentally how addressees exploit the information present in speakers' uses of pauses, uh, um, and other disfluences. A second will examine listeners' interpretations of utterances that contain various disfluencies. Series 5 is about how speakers order phrases based on their weight or complexity. Speakers ordinarily prefer, for example, "I looked up the man I had known for a long time" over I looked the man I had known for a long time up," placing the underlined heavy noun phrase late in the sentence. These studies will study spontaneous uses of many types of constructions for the syntactic, informational, and intonational factors that make phrases heavy. One study will investigate how weight is reflected in disfluencies. Series 6 will examine the process by which speakers select heavy vs. light phrases in real time. One experiment will investigate how speakers order phrases as they recall descriptions, and another, how they do so as they describe visual scenes. A final experiment will examine how quickly listeners follow instructions that contain heavy phrases in various orderings. |
1 |
2006 — 2010 | Wasow, Thomas Bresnan, Joan [⬀] Jurafsky, Daniel Ramscar, Michael (co-PI) [⬀] |
N/AActivity Code Description: No activity code was retrieved: click on the grant title for more information |
The Dynamics of Probabilistic Grammar @ Stanford University The use of language is central to human social dynamics. Current techniques for modeling human language are widely based on simplifying assumptions that underestimate human language capacities by ignoring statistical patterns. The present project starts from a strongly contrasting approach which can lead to a breakthrough in the understanding of linguistic dynamics by linking changes in language across the different time scales of speech, the human life cycle, and the history of communities. This approach models grammar as a highly plastic cognitive system sensitively tuned to the probabilities of the environment. The project combines detailed statistical analyses of patterns found in recorded speech with laboratory experiments on language production in adults and language learning in children. The phenomena considered include high-level grammatical choices (such as whether to say "give someone a job" or "give a job to someone"), low-level pronunciation choices (such as where "to" is reduced to "tuh"), and overregularizations (such as when children say "goed" instead of "went"). Studies will involve work with data from multiple dialects of English, as well as German and Chinese. The project involves cross-disciplinary collaboration among researchers trained in Linguistics, Psychology, and Computer Science. This research will lay the groundwork for improved language technologies, and may find other applications, for example in the treatment of language disorders. |
1 |
2010 — 2011 | Wasow, Thomas | N/AActivity Code Description: No activity code was retrieved: click on the grant title for more information |
The Role of Processing in Language Variation and Change @ Stanford University Linguistic communication is fundamentally a social activity, involving at least two people. A comprehensive theory of language must explain both what goes on in the minds of individual speakers and how those individuals attend to and coordinate with their interlocutors. Psycholinguists study the unconscious mental processes involved in speaking and understanding language; sociolinguists study how social factors like age, gender, class, ethnicity, and regional differences influence language use. These two types of investigators often study the same linguistic phenomena from their own perspective, but there have been few attempts to combine the perspectives. |
1 |