| Year | Citation | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | Surdick RT, Davis ET, King RA, Hodges LF. The perception of distance in simulated visual displays: A comparison of the effectiveness and accuracy of multiple depth cues across viewing distances Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 6: 513-531. DOI: 10.1162/Pres.1997.6.5.513 | 0.551 | |||
| 1996 | Elliott KG, King RA, Davis ET, Fujawa GE. Human distance and depth perception: An investigation of visual cues Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 37: S518. | 0.516 | |||
| 1996 | King RA, Elliott KG, Davis ET. A comparison of size constancy between matched scenes with many and few depth cues Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 37: S519. | 0.484 | |||
| 1996 | Akers JW, Davis ET, King RA. Is there a stereo aperture problem in human stereopsis? Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 37: S283. | 0.401 | |||
| 1996 | Elliott KG, Davis ET, King RA, Fujawa GE. Single and combined visual distance cues Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2: 1184-1187. | 0.495 | |||
| 1996 | Akers JW, Davis ET, King RA. Stereoscopic depth perception in simulated displays: what helps and what hurts? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2: 1193-1196. | 0.445 | |||
| 1995 | Davis ET, Yager D, King RA, Kirkland BA. A labeled lines explanation of the perceived spatial frequency of moderate-, near-threshold- and zero-contrast spatial patterns. Vision Research. 35: 1025-40. PMID 7762159 DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00198-U | 0.577 | |||
| 1994 | Troy Surdick R, Davis ET, King RA, Corso GM, Shapiro A, Hodges L, Elliot K. Relevant cues for the visual perception of depth: is where you see it where it is? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2: 1305-1309. | 0.509 | |||
| Show low-probability matches. | |||||