David A. Schkade - Publications

Affiliations: 
University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, U.S.A. 
Area:
Social Psychology, Management Business Administration, Speech Communication

30 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2012 Johnson EJ, Shu SB, Dellaert BGC, Fox C, Goldstein DG, Häubl G, Larrick RP, Payne JW, Peters E, Schkade D, Wansink B, Weber EU. Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture Marketing Letters. 23: 487-504. DOI: 10.1007/S11002-012-9186-1  0.363
2010 McGraw AP, Larsen JT, Kahneman D, Schkade D. Comparing gains and losses. Psychological Science. 21: 1438-45. PMID 20739673 DOI: 10.1177/0956797610381504  0.309
2010 Schkade D, Sunstein CR, Hastie R. When deliberation produces extremism Critical Review. 22: 227-252. DOI: 10.1080/08913811.2010.508634  0.313
2008 Krueger AB, Schkade DA. The Reliability of Subjective Well-Being Measures. Journal of Public Economics. 92: 1833-1845. PMID 19649136 DOI: 10.1016/J.Jpubeco.2007.12.015  0.319
2006 Kahneman D, Krueger AB, Schkade D, Schwarz N, Stone AA. Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion. Science (New York, N.Y.). 312: 1908-10. PMID 16809528 DOI: 10.1126/Science.1129688  0.327
2005 Lyubomirsky S, Sheldon KM, Schkade D. Pursuing Happiness: The Architecture of Sustainable Change Review of General Psychology. 9: 111-131. DOI: 10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111  0.318
2004 Sunstein CR, Schkade D, Ellman LM. Ideological Voting on Federal Courts of Appeals: A Preliminary Investigation Virginia Law Review. 90: 301. DOI: 10.2139/Ssrn.442480  0.358
2004 Kahneman D, Krueger AB, Schkade D, Schwarz N, Stone A. Toward national well-being accounts American Economic Review. 94: 429-434. DOI: 10.1257/0002828041301713  0.379
2002 Sunstein CR, Kahneman D, Schkade D, Ritov I. Predictably incoherent judgments Stanford Law Review. 54: 1153-1215. DOI: 10.2139/Ssrn.279181  0.372
2002 Swait J, Adamowicz W, Hanemann M, Diederich A, Krosnick J, Layton D, Provencher W, Schkade D, Tourangeau R. Context Dependence and Aggregation in Disaggregate Choice Analysis Marketing Letters. 13: 195-205. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020262503119  0.35
2000 Schkade D, Sunstein CR, Kahneman D. Deliberating about Dollars: The Severity Shift Columbia Law Review. 100: 1139. DOI: 10.2139/Ssrn.214619  0.356
2000 Sunstein CR, Schkade D, Kahneman D. Do people want optimal deterrence? Journal of Legal Studies. 29: 237. DOI: 10.2139/Ssrn.166168  0.313
1999 Hastie R, Schkade DA, Payne JW. Juror judgments in civil cases: Hindsight effects on judgments of liability for punitive damages Law and Human Behavior. 23: 597-614. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022352330466  0.357
1999 Hastie R, Schkade DA, Payne JW. Reply to Vidmar. Law and Human Behavior. 23: 715-718. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022349724531  0.373
1999 Hastie R, Schkade DA, Payne JW. Juror judgments in civil cases: Effects of plaintiff's requests and plaintiff's identity on punitive damage awards Law and Human Behavior. 23: 445-470. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022312115561  0.366
1999 West PM, Ariely D, Bellman S, Bradlow E, Huber J, Johnson E, Kahn B, Little J, Schkade D. Marketing Letters. 10: 285-300. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008127022539  0.334
1999 Kahneman D, Ritov I, Schkade D. Economic Preferences or Attitude Expressions?: An Analysis of Dollar Responses to Public Issues Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 19: 203-235. DOI: 10.1023/A:1007835629236  0.345
1998 Sunstein CR, Kahneman D, Schkade D. Assessing Punitive Damages (with Notes on Cognition and Valuation in Law) Yale Law Journal. 107: 2071-2144. DOI: 10.2307/797417  0.36
1998 Hastie R, Schkade DA, Payne JW. A study of juror and jury judgments in civil cases: Deciding liability for punitive damages Law and Human Behavior. 22: 287-314. DOI: 10.1023/A:1025754422703  0.358
1998 Kahneman D, Schkade D, Sunstein CR. Shared Outrage and Erratic Awards: The Psychology of Punitive Damages Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 16: 49-86. DOI: 10.1023/A:1007710408413  0.358
1996 Hoch SJ, Schkade DA. A psychological approach to decision support systems Management Science. 42: 51-64. DOI: 10.1287/Mnsc.42.1.51  0.35
1994 Stone DN, Schkade DA. Effects of Attribute Scales on Process and Performance in Multiattribute Choice Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 59: 261-287. DOI: 10.1006/Obhd.1994.1060  0.365
1994 Schkade DA, Kleinmuntz DN. Information Displays and Choice Processes: Differential Effects of Organization, Form, and Sequence Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 57: 319-337. DOI: 10.1006/Obhd.1994.1018  0.354
1994 Schkade DA, Payne JW. How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 26: 88-109. DOI: 10.1006/Jeem.1994.1006  0.38
1993 Kleinmuntz DN, Schkade DA. Information Displays and Decision Processes Psychological Science. 4: 221-227. DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-9280.1993.Tb00265.X  0.342
1993 Schkade DA, Payne JW. Where Do the Numbers Come From? How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions Contributions to Economic Analysis. 220: 271-303. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-81469-2.50012-2  0.315
1991 Schkade DA, Kilbourne LM. Expectation-outcome consistency and hindsight bias Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 49: 105-123. DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90044-T  0.341
1991 Stone DN, Schkade DA. Numeric and linguistic information representation in multiattribute choice Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 49: 42-59. DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90041-Q  0.366
1989 Johnson EJ, Schkade DA. Bias in utility assessments: further evidence and explanations Management Science. 35: 406-424. DOI: 10.1287/Mnsc.35.4.406  0.308
1989 Schkade DA, Johnson EJ. Cognitive processes in preference reversals Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 44: 203-231. DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(89)90025-3  0.35
Show low-probability matches.