Year |
Citation |
Score |
2019 |
Thompson WC, Scurich N. How Cross-Examination on Subjectivity and Bias Affects Jurors' Evaluations of Forensic Science Evidence. Journal of Forensic Sciences. PMID 30791101 DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14031 |
0.338 |
|
2018 |
Thompson WC, Scurich N. When does absence of evidence constitute evidence of absence? Forensic Science International. PMID 30224092 DOI: 10.1016/J.Forsciint.2018.08.040 |
0.392 |
|
2016 |
Saks MJ, Albright T, Bohan TL, Bierer BE, Bowers CM, Bush MA, Bush PJ, Casadevall A, Cole SA, Denton MB, Diamond SS, Dioso-Villa R, Epstein J, Faigman D, Faigman L, ... ... Thompson WC, et al. Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claims. Journal of Law and the Biosciences. 3: 538-575. PMID 28852538 DOI: 10.1093/Jlb/Lsw045 |
0.718 |
|
2016 |
Vuille J, Thompson WC. An American Advantage? How American and Swiss Criminal Defense Attorneys Evaluate Forensic DNA Evidence International Commentary On Evidence. 14: 1-41. DOI: 10.1515/Ice-2016-0002 |
0.364 |
|
2015 |
Thompson WC, Newman EJ. Lay understanding of forensic statistics: Evaluation of random match probabilities, likelihood ratios, and verbal equivalents. Law and Human Behavior. 39: 332-49. PMID 25984887 DOI: 10.1037/Lhb0000134 |
0.389 |
|
2015 |
Koppl R, Charlton D, Kornfield I, Krane D, Risinger M, Robertson C, Saks M, Thompson W. Do Observer Effects Matter? A Comment on Langenburg, Bochet, and Ford Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal. 6: 1-6. DOI: 10.1080/19409044.2014.995385 |
0.338 |
|
2014 |
Risinger DM, Thompson WC, Jamieson A, Koppl R, Kornfield I, Krane D, Mnookin JL, Rosenthal R, Saks MJ, Zabell SL. Regarding Champod, editorial: "Research focused mainly on bias will paralyse forensic science". Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society. 54: 508-9. PMID 25498942 DOI: 10.1016/J.Scijus.2014.06.002 |
0.711 |
|
2013 |
Thompson WC, Vuille J, Biedermann A, Taroni F. The role of prior probability in forensic assessments. Frontiers in Genetics. 4: 220. PMID 24194748 DOI: 10.3389/Fgene.2013.00220 |
0.356 |
|
2013 |
Thompson WC. Rejecting the Evidence Science. 339: 34-35. DOI: 10.1126/Science.1231183 |
0.365 |
|
2013 |
Thompson WC, Kaasa SO, Peterson T. Do Jurors Give Appropriate Weight to Forensic Identification Evidence? Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. 10: 359-397. DOI: 10.1111/Jels.12013 |
0.375 |
|
2012 |
Thompson WC. Discussion Paper: Hard Cases Make Bad Law -- Reactions to R v. T Law, Probability and Risk. 11: 347-359. DOI: 10.1093/Lpr/Mgs020 |
0.346 |
|
2011 |
Thompson WC, Ford S, Gilder JR, Inman K, Jamieson A, Koppl R, Kornfield IL, Krane DE, Mnookin JL, Risinger DM, Rudin N, Saks MJ, Zabell SL. Commentary on: Thornton JI. Letter to the editor--aa rejection of "working blind" as a cure for contextual bias. J Forensic Sci 2010;55(6):1663. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 56: 562-3. PMID 21342200 DOI: 10.1111/J.1556-4029.2010.01679.X |
0.677 |
|
2011 |
Thompson WC. What role should investigative facts play in the evaluation of scientific evidence Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 43: 123-134. DOI: 10.2139/Ssrn.1694722 |
0.415 |
|
2011 |
Biedermann A, Taroni F, Thompson WC. Using graphical probability analysis (Bayes Nets) to evaluate a conditional DNA inclusion Law, Probability and Risk. 10: 89-121. DOI: 10.1093/Lpr/Mgr007 |
0.332 |
|
2010 |
Thompson WC. An American Psychology-Law Society scientific review paper on police interrogation and confession. Law and Human Behavior. 34: 1-2. PMID 20091338 DOI: 10.1007/S10979-009-9213-9 |
0.301 |
|
2009 |
Krane DE, Bahn V, Balding D, Barlow B, Cash H, Desportes BL, D'Eustachio P, Devlin K, Doom TE, Dror I, Ford S, Funk C, Gilder J, Hampikian G, Inman K, ... ... Thompson WC, et al. Time for DNA disclosure. Science (New York, N.Y.). 326: 1631-2. PMID 20019271 DOI: 10.1126/Science.326.5960.1631 |
0.691 |
|
2009 |
Gilder J, Koppl R, Kornfield I, Krane D, Mueller L, Thompson W. Comments on the review of low copy number testing International Journal of Legal Medicine. 123: 535-536. PMID 18800222 DOI: 10.1007/S00414-008-0281-Z |
0.399 |
|
2009 |
Thompson WC. Painting the target around the matching profile: the Texas sharpshooter fallacy in forensic DNA interpretation Law, Probability and Risk. 8: 257-276. DOI: 10.1093/Lpr/Mgp013 |
0.334 |
|
2008 |
Krane DE, Ford S, Gilder JR, Inman K, Jamieson A, Koppl R, Kornfield IL, Risinger DM, Rudin N, Taylor MS, Thompson WC. Sequential unmasking: a means of minimizing observer effects in forensic DNA interpretation. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 53: 1006-7. PMID 18638252 DOI: 10.1111/J.1556-4029.2008.00787.X |
0.328 |
|
2007 |
Kaasa SO, Peterson T, Morris EK, Thompson WC. Statistical inference and forensic evidence: evaluating a bullet lead match. Law and Human Behavior. 31: 433-47. PMID 17186386 DOI: 10.1007/S10979-006-9074-4 |
0.303 |
|
2006 |
Dioso R, Thompson WC. Review of: DNA and the Criminal Justice System: The Technology of Justice Journal of Forensic Sciences. 51: 206-207. DOI: 10.1111/J.1556-4029.2005.00045.X |
0.317 |
|
2005 |
Quas JA, Thompson WC, Alison K, Stewart C. Do jurors "know" what isn't so about child witnesses? Law and Human Behavior. 29: 425-56. PMID 16133948 DOI: 10.1007/S10979-005-5523-8 |
0.303 |
|
2004 |
Thompson WC, Taroni F, Aitken CGG. Thompson WC, Taroni F, Aitken CGG. How the probability of a false positive affects the value of DNA evidence. J Forensic Sci 2003;48(1):4754. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 49: 1-2. DOI: 10.1520/Jfs2003315 |
0.311 |
|
2004 |
Saks MJ, Risinger DM, Rosenthal R, Thompson WC. Context effects in forensic science Science & Justice. 44: 119. DOI: 10.1016/S1355-0306(04)72276-5 |
0.346 |
|
2003 |
Saks MJ, Risinger DM, Rosenthal R, Thompson WC. Context effects in forensic science: a review and application of the science of science to crime laboratory practice in the United States. Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society. 43: 77-90. PMID 12879569 DOI: 10.1016/S1355-0306(03)71747-X |
0.436 |
|
2003 |
Thompson WC, Taroni F, Aitken CG. How the probability of a false positive affects the value of DNA evidence. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 48: 47-54. PMID 12570198 DOI: 10.1520/Jfs2001171 |
0.36 |
|
2002 |
Risinger DM, Saks MJ, Thompson WC, Rosenthal R. The Daubert/Kumho Implications of Observer Effects in Forensic Science: Hidden Problems of Expectation and Suggestion California Law Review. 90: 1-56. DOI: 10.2307/3481305 |
0.457 |
|
1995 |
Thompson WC. Subjective interpretation, laboratory error and the value of forensic DNA evidence: three case studies. Genetica. 96: 153-168. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-306-46851-3_17 |
0.39 |
|
1987 |
Thompson WC, Schumann EL. Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy. Law and Human Behavior. 11: 167-187. DOI: 10.1007/Bf01044641 |
0.34 |
|
1980 |
Reyes RM, Thompson WC, Bower GH. Judgmental biases resulting from differing availabilities of arguments Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 39: 2-12. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.39.1.2 |
0.31 |
|
Show low-probability matches. |