
William K. Estes - US grants
Affiliations: | 1946-1962 | Indiana University, Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States | |
1962-1968 | Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA | ||
1968-1979 | Rockefeller University, New York, NY, United States | ||
1979-1999 | Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States |
Area:
Learning & memoryWebsite:
http://www.mathpsych.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=131:william-k-estesWe are testing a new system for linking grants to scientists.
The funding information displayed below comes from the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools and the NSF Award Database.The grant data on this page is limited to grants awarded in the United States and is thus partial. It can nonetheless be used to understand how funding patterns influence mentorship networks and vice-versa, which has deep implications on how research is done.
You can help! If you notice any innacuracies, please sign in and mark grants as correct or incorrect matches.
High-probability grants
According to our matching algorithm, William K. Estes is the likely recipient of the following grants.Years | Recipients | Code | Title / Keywords | Matching score |
---|---|---|---|---|
1976 — 1980 | Estes, William | N/AActivity Code Description: No activity code was retrieved: click on the grant title for more information |
Processes of Perception and Decision @ Rockefeller University |
0.915 |
1978 — 1988 | Estes, William | N/AActivity Code Description: No activity code was retrieved: click on the grant title for more information |
Processes of Short-Term Memory and Attention @ Harvard University |
0.915 |
1981 — 1995 | Estes, William | N/AActivity Code Description: No activity code was retrieved: click on the grant title for more information |
Mathematical Models in Cognitive Psychology @ Harvard University |
0.915 |
1985 — 1987 | Estes, William K. | R01Activity Code Description: To support a discrete, specified, circumscribed project to be performed by the named investigator(s) in an area representing his or her specific interest and competencies. |
Concepts and Conceptual Combination @ Harvard University The proposed research focuses on two general issues: (1) how are simple, natural concepts combined to form complex ones, and (2) what processes govern the course of learning novel categories. With regard to (1), our previous work led to a model of how people combine concepts like red and fruit into adjective-noun conjunctions like red fruit. The basic idea is that the noun concept is represented by default values on each of a set of attributes, and that the adjective modifies the value on one of the attributes. This model is among the first to offer a detailed account of how prototype concepts can be combined to form new prototypes. The model has implications for many areas of psychology and our proposed research will test some of these implications and extend the model to new domains. Some studies will evaluate the model's claims about real-time processes during categorization, while others will try to bridge the gap between categorization and psycholinguistics by showing that the categorization processes we have described in our model are involved in language understanding. Still other studies will extend our analyses to conjunctions involving verbs, as well as explore the relation between combining concepts and decision making. The research on category learning considers how experience with exemplars leads to the development of categories. The proposed work will concentrate on distinguishing similarity-based from likelihood-based models of category learning. Some of the experimental tasks simulate the problem of assigning patients to disease categories on the basis of symptom patterns, the task being accomplished either by judging the similarity of new to old exemplars of the categories or by computing the likelihoods of the categories given the symptoms. Correlations between symptoms will be introduced so as to enable differential predictions from similarity and likelihood based models. Our prior research on concepts turned up important implications for psychiatric diagnosis, as well as for personality categories and social stereotypes. We expect the current work to continue to have implications for diagnosis, stereotypes, and aspects of mental illness, particularly since some of the work on combining concepts involves personality concepts, while some of the research on category learning uses diagnosis as the experimental task. |
1 |
1989 — 1992 | Estes, William | N/AActivity Code Description: No activity code was retrieved: click on the grant title for more information |
Categorization, Memory, and Decision @ Harvard University The research will focus on four outstanding problems in cognitive psychology, with overall direction and coherence supplied by continuing comparisons of memory storage and retrieval models with parallel distributed processing models: 1. An important form of classification learning is the development of skill at judging the probable causes of symptoms, as in medical diagnosis or trouble shooting of complex equipment. Such judgments depend both on similarities of new cases to previous ones and on frequencies of similar events in one's past experience. Analyses of simulated diagnostic situations will enable analysis of the way frequency information and similarity information combine in such judgments and the conditions for approaching optimal decision making. 2. Recognition is generally taken to be a more sensitive way of assessing information stored in memory then recall or other forms of testing. Past research has greatly clarified the basis for recognition judgments, but there has been little study of the underlying learning process. This deficit will be attacked by studies in which recognition tests are preceded by sequences of learning experiences, with the results interpreted in terms of adaptations of general models for classification learning. 3. How information acquired by learning fades from memory with time has long been studied, but the causes of retention loss are still not well understood. The view that a principal factor is the displacement of memories by new learning (or unlearning) that occurs between study and retention testing was undermined by numerous apparently negative research results. In this project, the hypothesis will be revived in the light of more effective models for learning and memory. Preliminary results indicate anew that new learning is an important factor in retention loss. 4. In decision situations such as gambles or choices between insurance packages, people normally make choices that tend to maximize probable returns; under some circumstances, however, conspicuous deviations from that type of rationality have been observed. One, termed the "sure thing" preference, is a tendency to choose an alternative that yields some certain payoff over another alternative whose outcome is uncertain but with a higher expected value. This project will investigate the nature of previous learning experiences that contribute to the presence or absence of the "sure thing" phenomenon and related deviations from optimal choice behavior. The expected result of this research is convergance on a model subsuming several of these types of behavior. Such a model would provide a firmer basis for our society's educational enterprise than models that only subsume one area of behavior. |
0.915 |
1994 — 2005 | Estes, William | N/AActivity Code Description: No activity code was retrieved: click on the grant title for more information |
Models For Classification and Memory @ Indiana University This work involves the continued development and application of models for recognition memory. The first phase included formulation of the architecture and basic processing modules of a recognition model based on general theories of classification and memory; the model has been formulated with special attention to usefulness in increasing the informativeness of measures extracted from recognition data. A major published application reported a study of how performance on a test of recognition of an item or event depends on past frequencies of encounters with the same or similar stimuli and on presence or absence of positive or negative payoffs for correct responses on previous tests. The major result reported was that performance in recognition is not simply a matter of matching perceived with remembered stimulus patterns, but is influenced by many of the same conditions that control goal-directed behavior. At this juncture, a new set of benchmark experiments has been completed and is ready for model-based analysis. Several of the experiments were addressed to the problem of how prior familiarity with stimuli such as words or faces affects their recognition in a new situation; others deal with ways of enhancing the precision of measurement of the way factors such as stimulus frequency, stimulus exposure duration, and retention interval affect performance in situations that simulate eyewitness identification. Results from this series of experiments are ready for model-based analyses, which will be very computationally demanding, because all models and model versions examined will be fitted to the data of individual subjects, typically 30 to 80 in number per experiment. In all of this work, there will be major attention to advancing methodology for dealing with artifacts of averaging data and to communicating theoretical results in forms available to potential users in education, medicine, and technology. |
0.915 |