Nilpa C. Shah, BSc MCOptom

Affiliations: 
Visual Neuroscience UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, England, United Kingdom 
Area:
Visual Psychophysics
Google:
"Nilpa Shah"
Mean distance: 18.01 (cluster 23)
 
SNBCP
BETA: Related publications

Publications

You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect.

Shah N, Dakin SC, Mulholland PJ, et al. (2022) The Effect of Induced Intraocular Stray Light on Recognition Thresholds for Pseudo-High-Pass Filtered Letters. Translational Vision Science & Technology. 11: 4
McVeigh EM, Ludden SM, Mohamed S, et al. (2022) Preliminary clinical validation of a new picture-based visual acuity test in children with amblyopia: a comparison of The Auckland Optotypes and crowded logMAR letters. Eye (London, England)
Ritchie A, Atamian S, Shah N, et al. (2021) Can Visual Acuity Be Reliably Measured at Home? Validation of Telemedicine Remote Computerised Visual Acuity Measurements. The British and Irish Orthoptic Journal. 17: 119-126
Matlach J, Mulholland PJ, Cilkova M, et al. (2016) Relationship between Psychophysical Measures of Retinal Ganglion Cell Density and In Vivo Measures of Cone Density in Glaucoma. Ophthalmology
Shah N, Dakin SC, Dobinson S, et al. (2016) Visual acuity loss in patients with age-related macular degeneration measured using a novel high-pass letter chart. The British Journal of Ophthalmology
Shah N, Dakin SC, Whitaker HL, et al. (2014) Effect of scoring and termination rules on test-retest variability of a novel high-pass letter acuity chart. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55: 1386-92
Shah N, Dakin SC, Anderson RS. (2012) Effect of optical defocus on detection and recognition of vanishing optotype letters in the fovea and periphery. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 53: 7063-70
Shah N, Laidlaw DA, Shah SP, et al. (2011) Computerized repeating and averaging improve the test-retest variability of ETDRS visual acuity measurements: implications for sensitivity and specificity. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 52: 9397-402
Shah N, Dakin SC, Redmond T, et al. (2011) Vanishing Optotype acuity: repeatability and effect of the number of alternatives. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics : the Journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists). 31: 17-22
See more...