Nilpa C. Shah, BSc MCOptom
Affiliations: | Visual Neuroscience | UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, England, United Kingdom |
Area:
Visual PsychophysicsGoogle:
"Nilpa Shah"Mean distance: 18.01 (cluster 23) | S | N | B | C | P |
Parents
Sign in to add mentor| Steven C. Dakin | grad student | 2013- | UCL Institute of Ophthalmology |
| Roger S. Anderson | grad student | 2011-2016 | UCL Institute of Ophthalmology |
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
|
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
| Matlach J, Mulholland P, Cilkova M, et al. (2023) Ageing changes in retinal outer nuclear layer thickness and cone photoreceptor density using adaptive optics-free imaging. European Journal of Ophthalmology. 11206721221144477 |
| Shah N, Dakin SC, Mulholland PJ, et al. (2022) The Effect of Induced Intraocular Stray Light on Recognition Thresholds for Pseudo-High-Pass Filtered Letters. Translational Vision Science & Technology. 11: 4 |
| McVeigh EM, Ludden SM, Mohamed S, et al. (2022) Preliminary clinical validation of a new picture-based visual acuity test in children with amblyopia: a comparison of The Auckland Optotypes and crowded logMAR letters. Eye (London, England) |
| Matlach J, Mulholland PJ, Cilkova M, et al. (2016) Relationship between Psychophysical Measures of Retinal Ganglion Cell Density and In Vivo Measures of Cone Density in Glaucoma. Ophthalmology |
| Shah N, Dakin SC, Dobinson S, et al. (2016) Visual acuity loss in patients with age-related macular degeneration measured using a novel high-pass letter chart. The British Journal of Ophthalmology |
| Shah N, Dakin SC, Whitaker HL, et al. (2014) Effect of scoring and termination rules on test-retest variability of a novel high-pass letter acuity chart. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55: 1386-92 |
| Shah N, Dakin SC, Anderson RS. (2012) Effect of optical defocus on detection and recognition of vanishing optotype letters in the fovea and periphery. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 53: 7063-70 |
| Shah N, Laidlaw DA, Shah SP, et al. (2011) Computerized repeating and averaging improve the test-retest variability of ETDRS visual acuity measurements: implications for sensitivity and specificity. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 52: 9397-402 |
| Shah N, Dakin SC, Redmond T, et al. (2011) Vanishing Optotype acuity: repeatability and effect of the number of alternatives. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics : the Journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists). 31: 17-22 |