Ken Jamel Hoyte
Affiliations: | Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI |
Area:
Cognitive Neuroscience and NeuroepidemiologyGoogle:
"Ken Hoyte"Bio:
Currently a postdoctoral fellow at The Michigan State University College of Human medicine. Working on projects related to Cognitive Function
Mean distance: 15.18 (cluster 15) | S | N | B | C | P |
Parents
Sign in to add mentorBradley Peterson | grad student | 2007- | New York State Psychiatric Institute/Columbia University Medical Center | |
Arthur Wingfield | grad student | 2002-2006 | Brandeis | |
(Understanding the cognitive and neural basis of language production and comprehension: Insights from healthy aging and unilateral brain damage.) | ||||
James C. Anthony | post-doc | Michigan State |
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
Brownell H, Hoyte KJ, Piquado T, et al. (2012) Analytic Methods for Single Subject and Small Sample Aphasia Research: Some Illustrations and a Discussion The Handbook of the Neuropsychology of Language. 2: 595-618 |
Hoyte KJ, Brownell H, Wingfield A. (2009) Components of speech prosody and their use in detection of syntactic structure by older adults. Experimental Aging Research. 35: 129-51 |
Wingfield A, Brownell H, Hoyte KJ. (2006) Variable solutions to the same problem: aberrant practice effects in object naming by three aphasic patients. Brain and Language. 97: 351-6 |
Hoyte KJ, Brownell H, Vesely L, et al. (2006) Decomposing prosody: Use of prosodic features for detection of syntactic structure and speech affect by patients with right hemisphere lesions Brain and Language. 99: 44-46 |
Hoyte KJ, Kim A, Brownell H, et al. (2004) Effects of right hemisphere brain injury on the use of components of prosody for syntactic comprehension Brain and Language. 91: 168-169 |
Wingfield A, Hoyte KJ, Kim A, et al. (2004) Differential impact on aphasic naming induced by repeated naming versus word-onset gating Brain and Language. 91: 142-143 |