Walter Charles Gogel
Affiliations: | 1965-1989 | Psychology | University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States |
Area:
PerceptionGoogle:
"Walter Charles Gogel"Bio:
(1918 - 2006)
https://psych.ucsb.edu/sites/default/files/docs/Biographies/Bio_Walter-Gogel.pdf
Parents
Sign in to add mentorEckhard Heinrich Hess | grad student | 1951 | Chicago (Evolution Tree) | |
(Study of chromatic color constancy in the visually naive and experienced chick by means of innate pecking preferences between differently colored mash) |
Children
Sign in to add traineeDonald Mershon | grad student | 1970 | UC Santa Barbara (Neurotree) |
Eugene R. Wist | post-doc | 1963-1964 | US Army Medical Research Laboratory, Fort Knox, Kentucky (Neurotree) |
BETA: Related publications
See more...
Publications
You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect. |
Gogel WC, Tietz JD. (1980) Relative cues and absolute distance perception. Perception & Psychophysics. 28: 321-8 |
Gogel WC. (1978) The adjacency principle in visual percerption. Scientific American. 238: 126-39 |
Gogel WC, Mershon DH. (1977) Local autonomy in visual space. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 18: 237-50 |
Gogel WC. (1972) Depth adjacency and cue effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 92: 176-81 |
Gogel WC. (1972) Scalar perceptions with binocular cues of distance. The American Journal of Psychology. 85: 477-97 |
Gogel WC, Sturm RD. (1971) Directional separation and the size cue to distance. Psychologische Forschung. 35: 57-80 |
Mershon DH, Gogel WC. (1970) Effect of stereoscopic cues on perceived whiteness. The American Journal of Psychology. 83: 55-67 |
Gogel WC. (1969) Equidistance effects in visual fields. The American Journal of Psychology. 82: 342-9 |
GOGEL WC. (1964) THE SIZE CUE TO VISUALLY PERCEIVED DISTANCE. AM 64-13. [Report]. Civil Aeromedical Research Institute (U.S.). 1-25 |
GOGEL WC. (1964) SIZE CUE TO VISUALLY PERCEIVED DISTANCE. Psychological Bulletin. 62: 217-35 |