| Year |
Citation |
Score |
| 2020 |
Jones AM, Bergold AN, Penrod S. Improving juror sensitivity to specific eyewitness factors: judicial instructions fail the test. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law : An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. 27: 366-385. PMID 33071546 DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1719379 |
0.383 |
|
| 2020 |
Bergold AN, Jones AM, Dillon MK, Penrod S. Eyewitnesses in the courtroom: a jury-level experimental examination of the impact of the Henderson instructions Journal of Experimental Criminology. 1-23. DOI: 10.1007/S11292-020-09412-3 |
0.31 |
|
| 2019 |
Lee J, Khogali M, Despodova NM, Penrod SD. A Third Party’s Judgment in Same-Race and Cross-Race Crimes Race and Social Problems. 11: 253-267. DOI: 10.1007/S12552-019-09266-Z |
0.332 |
|
| 2018 |
Jones AM, Penrod S. Research-Based Instructions Induce Sensitivity to Confession Evidence. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law : An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. 25: 257-272. PMID 31984019 DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2017.1364677 |
0.372 |
|
| 2018 |
Jones AM, Penrod S. Improving the effectiveness of the Henderson instruction safeguard against unreliable eyewitness identification Psychology Crime & Law. 24: 177-193. DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2017.1390113 |
0.325 |
|
| 2017 |
Dillon MK, Jones AM, Bergold AN, Hui CYT, Penrod SD. Henderson Instructions: Do They Enhance Evidence Evaluation? Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 17: 1-24. DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2017.1235964 |
0.395 |
|
| 2017 |
Wilford MM, Van Horn MC, Penrod SD, Greathouse SM. Not separate but equal? The impact of multiple-defendant trials on juror decision-making Psychology, Crime & Law. 24: 14-37. DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2017.1351969 |
0.357 |
|
| 2017 |
Jones AM, Bergold AN, Dillon MK, Penrod SD. Comparing the effectiveness of Henderson instructions and expert testimony: Which safeguard improves jurors’ evaluations of eyewitness evidence? Journal of Experimental Criminology. 13: 29-52. DOI: 10.1007/S11292-016-9279-6 |
0.319 |
|
| 2016 |
Smith AM, Wells GL, Lindsay RC, Penrod SD. Fair Lineups Are Better Than Biased Lineups and Showups, but Not Because They Increase Underlying Discriminability. Law and Human Behavior. PMID 27685645 DOI: 10.1037/Lhb0000219 |
0.312 |
|
| 2016 |
Jones AM, Penrod S. Can Expert Testimony Sensitize Jurors to Coercive Interrogation Tactics Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 16: 393-409. DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2016.1232029 |
0.405 |
|
| 2015 |
Tallon JA, Daftary-Kapur T, Penrod S. Defendant Remorse and Publicity in Capital Trials: Is Seeing Truly Believing? Criminal Justice and Behavior. 42: 1282-1302. DOI: 10.1177/0093854815602500 |
0.338 |
|
| 2015 |
Zimmerman D, Rodriguez D, Bergold A, Penrod S. The influence of pretrial exposure to community outrage and victim hardship on guilt judgments Psychology, Crime and Law. 1-20. DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2015.1120870 |
0.319 |
|
| 2015 |
Jones AM, Jones S, Penrod S. Examining legal authoritarianism in the impact of punishment severity on juror decisions Psychology, Crime and Law. 21: 939-951. DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2015.1077244 |
0.376 |
|
| 2014 |
Daftary-Kapur T, Penrod SD, O'Connor M, Wallace B. Examining pretrial publicity in a shadow jury paradigm: issues of slant, quantity, persistence and generalizability. Law and Human Behavior. 38: 462-77. PMID 24933173 DOI: 10.1037/Lhb0000081 |
0.423 |
|
| 2013 |
Patry MW, Penrod SD. Death Penalty Decisions: Instruction Comprehension, Attitudes, and Decision Mediators. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 13: 204-244. PMID 24072981 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2013.795816 |
0.389 |
|
| 2012 |
Bornstein BH, Deffenbacher KA, Penrod SD, McGorty EK. Effects of exposure time and cognitive operations on facial identification accuracy: A meta-analysis of two variables associated with initial memory strength Psychology, Crime and Law. 18: 473-490. DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2010.508458 |
0.306 |
|
| 2010 |
Daftary-Kapur T, Dumas R, Penrod SD. Jury decision-making biases and methods to counter them Legal and Criminological Psychology. 15: 133-154. DOI: 10.1348/135532509X465624 |
0.411 |
|
| 2010 |
Kim MC, Penrod SD. Legal decision making among Korean and American legal professionals and lay people International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice. 38: 175-197. DOI: 10.1016/J.Ijlcj.2011.01.004 |
0.398 |
|
| 2008 |
Bornstein BH, Penrod SD. Hugo who? G. F. Arnold's alternative early approach to psychology and law Applied Cognitive Psychology. 22: 759-768. DOI: 10.1002/Acp.1480 |
0.338 |
|
| 2007 |
Heuer L, Penrod S, Kattan A. The role of societal benefits and fairness concerns among decision makers and decision recipients. Law and Human Behavior. 31: 573-610. PMID 17245632 DOI: 10.1007/S10979-006-9084-2 |
0.341 |
|
| 2006 |
Wells GL, Memon A, Penrod SD. Eyewitness Evidence: Improving Its Probative Value. Psychological Science in the Public Interest : a Journal of the American Psychological Society. 7: 45-75. PMID 26158855 DOI: 10.1111/J.1529-1006.2006.00027.X |
0.405 |
|
| 2006 |
Deffenbacher KA, Bornstein BH, Penrod SD. Mugshot exposure effects: Retroactive interference, mugshot commitment, source confusion, and unconscious transference. Law and Human Behavior. 30: 287-307. PMID 16741635 DOI: 10.1007/S10979-006-9008-1 |
0.303 |
|
| 2004 |
O'Neil KM, Patry MW, Penrod SD. Exploring the effects of attitudes toward the death penalty on capital sentencing verdicts Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 10: 443-470. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.10.4.443 |
0.308 |
|
| 2003 |
O'Neil KM, Penrod SD, Bornstein BH. Web-based research: methodological variables' effects on dropout and sample characteristics. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers : a Journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc. 35: 217-26. PMID 12834076 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03202544 |
0.332 |
|
| 2002 |
Stolle DP, Robbennolt JK, Patry M, Penrod SD. Fractional factorial designs for legal psychology. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 20: 5-17. PMID 11979488 DOI: 10.1002/Bsl.475 |
0.326 |
|
| 2002 |
Studebaker CA, Robbennolt JK, Penrod SD, Pathak-Sharma MK, Groscup JL, Devenport JL. Studying pretrial publicity effects: new methods for improving ecological validity and testing external validity. Law and Human Behavior. 26: 19-41. PMID 11868618 DOI: 10.1023/A:1013877108082 |
0.388 |
|
| 2002 |
Heuer L, Penrod S, Hafer CL, Cohn I. The role of resource and relational concerns for procedural justice Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 28: 1468-1482. DOI: 10.1177/014616702237575 |
0.333 |
|
| 2002 |
Groscup JL, Studebaker CA, Penrod SD, Huss MT, O'Neil KM. The effects of daubert on the admissibility of expert testimony in state and federal criminal cases Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 8: 339-372. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.8.4.339 |
0.363 |
|
| 2000 |
Studebaker CA, Robbennolt JK, Pathak-Sharma MK, Penrod SD. Assessing pretrial publicity effects: integrating content analytic results. Law and Human Behavior. 24: 317-36. PMID 10846375 DOI: 10.1023/A:1005536204923 |
0.343 |
|
| 1998 |
Wells GL, Small M, Penrod S, Malpass RS, Fulero SM, Brimacombe CAE. Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads Law and Human Behavior. 22: 603-647. DOI: 10.1023/A:1025750605807 |
0.354 |
|
| 1997 |
Studebaker CA, Penrod SD. Pretrial Publicity: The Media, the Law, and Common Sense Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 3: 428-460. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.3.2-3.428 |
0.385 |
|
| 1997 |
Devenport JL, Penrod SD, Cutler BL. Eyewitness Identification Evidence: Evaluating Commonsense Evaluations Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 3: 338-361. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.3.2-3.338 |
0.379 |
|
| 1997 |
Penrod SD, Heuer L. Tweaking Commonsense: Assessing Aids to Jury Decision Making Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 3: 259-284. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.3.2-3.259 |
0.315 |
|
| 1995 |
Penrod SD, Fulero SM, Cutler BL. Expert psychological testimony on eyewitness reliability before and after Daubert: the state of the law and the science. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 13: 229-59. PMID 10150378 DOI: 10.1002/Bsl.2370130206 |
0.385 |
|
| 1995 |
Penrod SD, Fulero SM, Cutler BL. Expert Psychological Testimony in the United States: A New Playing Field? 1This paper is based in part on material presented at greater length in Cutler & Penrod (in press), Fulero (1993) and Penrod, Fulero, & Cutler (1994). European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 11: 65-72. DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759.11.1.65 |
0.365 |
|
| 1994 |
Heue L, Penrod S. Predicting the Outcomes of Disputes: Consequences for Disputant Reactions to Procedures and Outcomes1 Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 24: 260-283. DOI: 10.1111/J.1559-1816.1994.Tb00582.X |
0.316 |
|
| 1994 |
Kovera MB, Levy RJ, Borgida E, Penrod SD. Expert testimony in child sexual abuse cases - Effects of expert evidence type and cross-examination Law and Human Behavior. 18: 653-674. DOI: 10.1007/Bf01499330 |
0.356 |
|
| 1994 |
Heuer L, Penrod S. Trial complexity - A field investigation of its meaning and its effects Law and Human Behavior. 18: 29-51. DOI: 10.1007/Bf01499142 |
0.312 |
|
| 1994 |
Otto AL, Penrod SD, Dexter HR. The biasing impact of pretrial publicity on juror judgments Law and Human Behavior. 18: 453-469. DOI: 10.1007/Bf01499050 |
0.388 |
|
| 1994 |
Heuer L, Penrod S. Juror notetaking and question asking during trials - A national field experiment Law and Human Behavior. 18: 121-150. DOI: 10.1007/Bf01499012 |
0.371 |
|
| 1990 |
Cutler BL, Dexter HR, Penrod SD. Nonadversarial Methods for Sensitizing Jurors to Eyewitness Evidence Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 20: 1197-1207. DOI: 10.1111/J.1559-1816.1990.Tb00400.X |
0.375 |
|
| 1990 |
Cutler BL, Penrod SD, Dexter HR. Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence Law and Human Behavior. 14: 185-191. DOI: 10.1007/Bf01062972 |
0.353 |
|
| 1989 |
Cutler BL, Penrod SD. Forensically Relevant Moderators of the Relation Between Eyewitness Identification Accuracy and Confidence Journal of Applied Psychology. 74: 650-652. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.650 |
0.304 |
|
| 1989 |
Cutler BL, Penrod SD, Dexter HR. The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury Law and Human Behavior. 13: 311-332. DOI: 10.1007/Bf01067032 |
0.381 |
|
| 1989 |
Heuer L, Penrod SD. Instructing jurors - A field experiment with written and preliminary instructions Law and Human Behavior. 13: 409-430. DOI: 10.1007/Bf01056412 |
0.384 |
|
| 1989 |
O'Rourke TE, Penrod SD, Cutler BL, Stuve TE. The external validity of eyewitness identification research: Generalizing across subject populations Law and Human Behavior. 13: 385-395. DOI: 10.1007/Bf01056410 |
0.311 |
|
| 1989 |
Cutler BL, Dexter HR, Penrod SD. Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysis Behavioral Sciences &Amp; the Law. 7: 215-225. DOI: 10.1002/Bsl.2370070206 |
0.416 |
|
| 1989 |
Cutler BL, Penrod SD. Moderators of the confidence‐accuracy correlation in face recognition: The role of information processing and base‐rates Applied Cognitive Psychology. 3: 95-107. DOI: 10.1002/Acp.2350030202 |
0.333 |
|
| 1988 |
Cutler BL, Penrod SD. Improving the Reliability of Eyewitness Identification: Lineup Construction and Presentation Journal of Applied Psychology. 73: 281-290. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.281 |
0.304 |
|
| 1988 |
Sharp GL, Cutler BL, Penrod SD. Performance feedback improves the resolution of confidence judgments Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 42: 271-283. DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(88)90001-5 |
0.305 |
|
| 1988 |
Cutler BL, Penrod SD, Stuve TE. Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases Law and Human Behavior. 12: 41-55. DOI: 10.1007/Bf01064273 |
0.388 |
|
| 1988 |
Heuer L, Penrod S. Increasing jurors' participation in trials - A field experiment with jury notetaking and question asking Law and Human Behavior. 12: 231-261. DOI: 10.1007/Bf01044383 |
0.358 |
|
| 1987 |
Linz D, Penrod SD, Donnerstein EI. The Attorney General's Commission on Pornography: The Gaps Between “Findings” and Facts Law and Social Inquiry-Journal of the American Bar Foundation. 12: 713-736. DOI: 10.1111/J.1747-4469.1987.Tb00555.X |
0.334 |
|
| 1987 |
Cutler BL, Penrod SD, Martens TK. Improving the Reliability of Eyewitness Identification: Putting Context Into Context Journal of Applied Psychology. 72: 629-637. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.72.4.629 |
0.322 |
|
| 1987 |
Linz D, Donnerstein E, Penrod S. The findings and recommendations of the Attorney General's Commission on Pornography: Do the psychological "facts" fit the political fury? American Psychologist. 42: 946-953. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.42.10.946 |
0.305 |
|
| 1986 |
Tanford S, Penrod S. Jury Deliberations: Discussion Content and Influence Processes in Jury Decision Making1 Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 16: 322-347. DOI: 10.1111/J.1559-1816.1986.Tb01144.X |
0.364 |
|
| 1986 |
Linz D, Penrod S, Donnerstein EI. Issues Bearing on the Legal Regulation of Violent and Sexually Violent Media Journal of Social Issues. 42: 171-193. DOI: 10.1111/J.1540-4560.1986.Tb00249.X |
0.317 |
|
| 1986 |
Shapiro PN, Penrod S. Meta-Analysis of Facial Identification Studies Psychological Bulletin. 100: 139-156. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.100.2.139 |
0.369 |
|
| 1986 |
Heuer LB, Penrod S. Procedural Preference as a Function of Conflict Intensity Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 51: 700-710. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.4.700 |
0.353 |
|
| 1986 |
Linz D, Penrod S, McDonald E. Attorney communication and impression making in the courtroom - Views from Off the Bench Law and Human Behavior. 10: 281-302. DOI: 10.1007/Bf01047342 |
0.353 |
|
| 1985 |
Krafka C, Penrod S. Reinstatement of Context in a Field Experiment on Eyewitness Identification Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 49: 58-69. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.58 |
0.331 |
|
| 1985 |
Tanford S, Penrod S, Collins R. Decision making in joined criminal trials: The influence of charge similarity, evidence similarity, and limiting instructions Law and Human Behavior. 9: 319-337. DOI: 10.1007/Bf01044474 |
0.332 |
|
| 1984 |
Tanford S, Penrod S. Social Influence Model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes Psychological Bulletin. 95: 189-225. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.95.2.189 |
0.329 |
|
| 1983 |
Tanford S, Penrod S. Computer Modeling of Influence in the Jury: The Role of the Consistent Juror Social Psychology Quarterly. 46: 200. DOI: 10.2307/3033791 |
0.342 |
|
| 1980 |
Penrod S, Hastie R. "A computer simulation of jury decision making": Correction to Penrod and Hastie. Psychological Review. 87: 476-476. DOI: 10.1037/H0078191 |
0.305 |
|
| Show low-probability matches. |