☰

Gautam Puhan, Ph.D. - Publications

Affiliations: 
2003 University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 
Area:
Tests and Measurements Education, Sciences Education
Tree Info Grants Similar researchers PubMed Report error

38 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2014 Guo H, Puhan G. Section preequating under the equivalent groups design without IRT Journal of Educational Measurement. 51: 301-317. DOI: 10.1111/Jedm.12049  0.464
2014 Zu J, Puhan G. Preequating with empirical item characteristic curves: An observed-score preequating method Journal of Educational Measurement. 51: 281-300. DOI: 10.1111/Jedm.12047  0.521
2013 Puhan G. Rater comparability scoring and equating: Does choice of target population weights matter in this context? Journal of Educational Measurement. 50: 374-380. DOI: 10.1111/jedm.12023  0.301
2013 Guo H, Puhan G, Walker M. A Criterion To Evaluate The Individual Raw‐To‐Scale Equating Conversions Ets Research Report Series. 2013: 16. DOI: 10.1002/J.2333-8504.2013.Tb02312.X  0.466
2013 Puhan G. Choice Of Target Population Weights In Rater Comparability Scoring And Equating Ets Research Report Series. 2013. DOI: 10.1002/J.2333-8504.2013.Tb02310.X  0.471
2012 Puhan G. Choosing Among Tucker or Chained Linear Equating in Two Testing Situations: Rater Comparability Scoring and Randomly Equivalent Groups With an Anchor Journal of Educational Measurement. 49: 312-329. DOI: 10.1111/J.1745-3984.2012.00177.X  0.534
2011 Sinharay S, Puhan G, Haberman SJ. An NCME Instructional Module on Subscores Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 30: 29-40. DOI: 10.1111/J.1745-3992.2011.00208.X  0.379
2011 Puhan G, Liang L. Equating Subscores under the Nonequivalent Anchor Test (NEAT) Design Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 30: 23-35. DOI: 10.1111/J.1745-3992.2010.00197.X  0.534
2011 Puhan G. Futility of log-linear smoothing when equating with unrepresentative small samples Journal of Educational Measurement. 48: 274-292. DOI: 10.1111/J.1745-3984.2011.00147.X  0.462
2011 Puhan G. Impact of inclusion or exclusion of repeaters on test equating International Journal of Testing. 11: 215-230. DOI: 10.1080/15305058.2011.555575  0.44
2011 Puhan G. Can Smoothing Help When Equating With Unrepresentative Small Samples Ets Research Report Series. 2011. DOI: 10.1002/J.2333-8504.2011.Tb02245.X  0.466
2011 Puhan G, Liang L. Equating Subscores Using Total Scaled Scores As An Anchor Ets Research Report Series. 2011. DOI: 10.1002/J.2333-8504.2011.Tb02243.X  0.527
2010 Sinharay S, Puhan G, Haberman SJ. Reporting Diagnostic Scores in Educational Testing: Temptations, Pitfalls, and Some Solutions. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 45: 553-73. PMID 26760492 DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2010.483382  0.429
2010 Puhan G, von Davier AA, Gupta S. A brief report on how impossible scores affect smoothing and equating Educational and Psychological Measurement. 70: 953-960. DOI: 10.1177/0013164410382731  0.497
2010 Puhan G. A comparison of chained linear and poststratification linear equating under different testing conditions Journal of Educational Measurement. 47: 54-75. DOI: 10.1111/J.1745-3984.2009.00099.X  0.495
2010 Puhan G, Sinharay S, Haberman S, Larkin K. The utility of augmented subscores in a licensure exam: An evaluation of methods using empirical data Applied Measurement in Education. 23: 266-285. DOI: 10.1080/08957347.2010.486287  0.409
2010 Tan X, Ricker KL, Puhan G. Single- Versus Double-Scoring Of Trend Responses In Trend Score Equating With Constructed-Response Tests Ets Research Report Series. 2010. DOI: 10.1002/J.2333-8504.2010.Tb02219.X  0.512
2010 Dorans NJ, Liang L, Puhan G. Aligning Scales Of Certification Tests Ets Research Report Series. 2010: 26. DOI: 10.1002/J.2333-8504.2010.Tb02214.X  0.508
2010 Puhan G. Chained Versus Post‐Stratification Equating In A Linear Context: An Evaluation Using Empirical Data Ets Research Report Series. 2010. DOI: 10.1002/J.2333-8504.2010.Tb02213.X  0.521
2009 Haberman S, Sinharay S, Puhan G. Reporting subscores for institutions. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 62: 79-95. PMID 17937841 DOI: 10.1348/000711007X248875  0.346
2009 Puhan G. Book Review: by Samuel A. Livingston. Equating Test Scores (Without IRT). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 2004, 68 pp. (paperback) Applied Psychological Measurement. 33: 640-642. DOI: 10.1177/0146621608291568  0.377
2009 Puhan G, Moses TP, Yu L, Dorans NJ. Using log-linear smoothing to improve small-sample DIF estimation Journal of Educational Measurement. 46: 59-83. DOI: 10.1111/J.1745-3984.2009.01069.X  0.424
2009 Puhan G, Moses TP, Grant MC, McHale F. Small-sample equating using a single-group nearly equivalent test (SiGNET) design Journal of Educational Measurement. 46: 344-362. DOI: 10.1111/J.1745-3984.2009.00085.X  0.519
2009 Puhan G. Detecting and correcting scale drift in test equating: An illustration from a large scale testing program Applied Measurement in Education. 22: 79-103. DOI: 10.1080/08957340802558391  0.543
2009 Puhan G. What Effect Does The Inclusion Or Exclusion Of Repeaters Have On Test Equating Ets Research Report Series. 2009. DOI: 10.1002/J.2333-8504.2009.Tb02176.X  0.511
2008 Puhan G, Sinharay S, Haberman S, Larkin K. Comparison Of Subscores Based On Classical Test Theory Methods Ets Research Report Series. 2008. DOI: 10.1002/J.2333-8504.2008.Tb02140.X  0.412
2008 Yu L, Moses T, Puhan G, Dorans N. Dif Detection With Small Samples: Applying Smoothing Techniques To Frequency Distributions In The Mantel‐Haenszel Procedure Ets Research Report Series. 2008. DOI: 10.1002/J.2333-8504.2008.Tb02130.X  0.329
2008 Puhan G, Moses T, Grant M, McHale F. An Alternative Data Collection Design For Equating With Very Small Samples Ets Research Report Series. 2008: 35. DOI: 10.1002/J.2333-8504.2008.Tb02097.X  0.513
2008 Puhan G, Davier Av, Gupta S. Impossible Scores Resulting In Zero Frequencies In The Anchor Test: Impact On Smoothing And Equating Ets Research Report Series. 2008: 26. DOI: 10.1002/J.2333-8504.2008.Tb02096.X  0.499
2007 Sinharay S, Haberman S, Puhan G. Subscores based on classical test theory: To report or not to report Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 26: 21-28. DOI: 10.1111/J.1745-3992.2007.00105.X  0.425
2007 Puhan G. Scale Drift In Equating On A Test That Employs Cut Scores Ets Research Report Series. 2007. DOI: 10.1002/J.2333-8504.2007.Tb02076.X  0.557
2007 Puhan G, Moses TP, Yu L, Dorans NJ. Small‐Sample Dif Estimation Using Log‐Linear Smoothing: A Sibtest Application Ets Research Report Series. 2007. DOI: 10.1002/J.2333-8504.2007.Tb02052.X  0.448
2007 Puhan G, Boughton K, Kim S. Examining differences in examinee performance in paper and pencil and computerized testing Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment. 6: 1-19.  0.408
2006 Puhan G, Gierl MJ. Evaluating the effectiveness of two-stage testing on english and french versions of a science achievement test Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 37: 136-154. DOI: 10.1177/0022022105284492  0.61
2006 Puhan G, Larkin KC, Rupp SL. Subpopulation Invariance Of Equating Functions Ets Research Report Series. 2006. DOI: 10.1002/J.2333-8504.2006.Tb02031.X  0.498
2006 Haberman SJ, Sinharay S, Puhan G. SUBSCORES FOR INSTITUTIONS Ets Research Report Series. 2006: i-24. DOI: 10.1002/J.2333-8504.2006.Tb02019.X  0.301
2005 Puhan G, Boughton KA, Kim S. Evaluating The Comparability Of Paper‐And‐Pencil And Computerized Versions Of A Large‐Scale Certification Test Ets Research Report Series. 2005. DOI: 10.1002/J.2333-8504.2005.Tb01998.X  0.517
2004 Ercikan K, Gierl MJ, McCreith T, Puhan G, Koh K. Comparability of bilingual versions of assessments: Sources of incomparability of English and French versions of Canada's national achievement tests Applied Measurement in Education. 17: 301-321. DOI: 10.1207/S15324818Ame1703_4  0.605
Show low-probability matches.