Neil W. Mulligan - Publications

Affiliations: 
Psychology University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 
Area:
Cognitive Psychology

112 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2024 West JT, Kuhns JM, Touron DR, Mulligan N. EXPRESS: Increased Metamemory Accuracy with Practice Does Not Require Practice with Metamemory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006). 17470218241269322. PMID 39075802 DOI: 10.1177/17470218241269322  0.357
2023 Saraulli D, Mulligan NW, Saraulli S, Spataro P. Exploring the roles of distinctiveness and performance anticipation in the Attentional Boost Effect. Memory (Hove, England). 1-13. PMID 37723858 DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2023.2260147  0.466
2023 Mulligan NW, Spataro P, West JT. Memory and attention: A double dissociation between memory encoding and memory retrieval. Cognition. 238: 105509. PMID 37354786 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105509  0.751
2023 Mulligan NW, Buchin ZL, Powers A. Transitive inference and the testing effect: Retrieval practice impairs transitive inference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006). 17470218231156732. PMID 36760059 DOI: 10.1177/17470218231156732  0.394
2022 Spataro P, Mulligan NW, Saraulli D, Rossi-Arnaud C. The attentional boost effect facilitates the encoding of contextual details: New evidence with verbal materials and a modified recognition task. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics. 84: 1489-1500. PMID 35581432 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02509-z  0.606
2022 Mulligan NW, Susser JA, Horschler DJ. Action memory and metamemory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. PMID 35549444 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001136  0.571
2021 Mulligan NW, Buchin ZL, West JT. Attention, the testing effect, and retrieval-induced forgetting: Distraction dissociates the positive and negative effects of retrieval on subsequent memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. PMID 34726435 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001097  0.747
2021 Besken M, Mulligan NW. The bizarreness effect and visual imagery: No impact of concurrent visuo-spatial distractor tasks indicates little role for visual imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. PMID 34351199 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001038  0.792
2021 Smith SA, Mulligan NW. Immersion, presence, and episodic memory in virtual reality environments. Memory (Hove, England). 1-23. PMID 34294002 DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1953535  0.534
2021 Su N, Buchin ZL, Mulligan NW. Levels of retrieval and the testing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 47: 652-670. PMID 33983787 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000962  0.514
2021 Spataro P, Mulligan NW, Cestari V, Santirocchi A, Saraulli D, Rossi-Arnaud C. The attentional boost effect enhances the item-specific, but not the relational, encoding of verbal material: Evidence from multiple recall tests with related and unrelated lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. PMID 33818117 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001020  0.475
2021 Mulligan NW, Spataro P, Rossi-Arnaud C, Wall AR. The attentional boost effect and source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. PMID 33464110 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000990  0.61
2020 West JT, Mulligan NW. Investigating the replicability and boundary conditions of the mnemonic advantage for disgust. Cognition & Emotion. 1-21. PMID 33342363 DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2020.1863187  0.7
2020 Spataro P, Saraulli D, Cestari V, Mulligan NW, Santirocchi A, Borowiecki O, Rossi-Arnaud C. The attentional boost effect enhances the recognition of bound features in short-term memory. Memory (Hove, England). 1-12. PMID 32723155 DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1801752  0.542
2019 Picklesimer ME, Buchin ZL, Mulligan NW. The Effect of Retrieval Practice on Transitive Inference. Experimental Psychology. 66: 377-392. PMID 32054429 DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/A000467  0.481
2019 Mulligan NW, Buchin ZL, West JT. Assessing why the testing effect is moderated by experimental design. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. PMID 31697142 DOI: 10.1037/Xlm0000787  0.704
2019 Buchin ZL, Mulligan NW. The testing effect under divided attention: Educational application. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied. PMID 31070392 DOI: 10.1037/Xap0000230  0.522
2019 Buchin ZL, Mulligan NW. Divided attention and the encoding effects of retrieval. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006). 1747021819847141. PMID 30975038 DOI: 10.1177/1747021819847141  0.665
2019 West JT, Mulligan NW. Prospective metamemory, like retrospective metamemory, exhibits underconfidence with practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. PMID 30920287 DOI: 10.1037/Xlm0000708  0.781
2019 Susser JA, Mulligan NW. Exploring the intrinsic-extrinsic distinction in prospective metamemory Journal of Memory and Language. 104: 43-55. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jml.2018.09.003  0.599
2018 Mulligan NW, Smith SA, Buchin ZL. The generation effect and experimental design. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. PMID 30284868 DOI: 10.1037/Xlm0000663  0.499
2018 Smith SA, Mulligan NW. Distinctiveness and the Attentional Boost Effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. PMID 29389185 DOI: 10.1037/Xlm0000531  0.57
2017 Mulligan NW, Rawson KA, Peterson DJ, Wissman KT. The Replicability of the Negative Testing Effect: Differences Across Participant Populations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. PMID 29094992 DOI: 10.1037/Xlm0000490  0.582
2017 Buchin ZL, Mulligan NW. The Testing Effect Under Divided Attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. PMID 28504527 DOI: 10.1037/Xlm0000427  0.666
2017 Spataro P, Saraulli D, Mulligan NW, Cestari V, Costanzi M, Rossi-Arnaud C. Not all identification tasks are born equal: testing the involvement of production processes in perceptual identification and lexical decision. Psychological Research. PMID 28285363 DOI: 10.1007/S00426-017-0852-Z  0.521
2017 Susser JA, Panitz J, Buchin Z, Mulligan NW. The motoric fluency effect on metamemory Journal of Memory and Language. 95: 116-123. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jml.2017.03.002  0.483
2016 Foster CM, Picklesimer M, Mulligan NW, Giovanello KS. The effect of age on relational encoding as revealed by hippocampal functional connectivity. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. PMID 27496142 DOI: 10.1016/J.Nlm.2016.07.026  0.362
2016 Spataro P, Mulligan NW, Bechi Gabrielli G, Rossi-Arnaud C. Divided attention enhances explicit but not implicit conceptual memory: an item-specific account of the attentional boost effect. Memory (Hove, England). 1-6. PMID 26881481 DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1144769  0.669
2016 Susser JA, Jin A, Mulligan NW. Identity priming consistently affects perceptual fluency but only affects metamemory when primes are obvious. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 42: 657-62. PMID 26371493 DOI: 10.1037/Xlm0000189  0.635
2016 Mulligan NW, Susser JA, Smith SA. The testing effect is moderated by experimental design Journal of Memory and Language. 90: 49-65. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jml.2016.03.006  0.53
2015 Peterson DJ, Mulligan NW. Action Memory and Encoding Time: Evidence for a Strategic View of Action Memory Processing. The American Journal of Psychology. 128: 419-29. PMID 26721171 DOI: 10.5406/Amerjpsyc.128.4.0419  0.593
2015 Mulligan NW, Picklesimer M. Attention and the Testing Effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. PMID 26618913 DOI: 10.1037/Xlm0000227  0.597
2015 Mulligan NW, Smith SA, Spataro P. The Attentional Boost Effect and Context Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. PMID 26348201 DOI: 10.1037/Xlm0000183  0.704
2015 Susser JA, Mulligan NW. The effect of motoric fluency on metamemory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 22: 1014-9. PMID 25413684 DOI: 10.3758/S13423-014-0768-1  0.573
2015 Spataro P, Mulligan NW, Rossi-Arnaud C. Limits to the attentional boost effect: the moderating influence of orthographic distinctiveness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 22: 987-92. PMID 25413683 DOI: 10.3758/S13423-014-0767-2  0.542
2015 Mulligan NW, Peterson DJ. The negative testing and negative generation effects are eliminated by delay. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 41: 1014-25. PMID 25329076 DOI: 10.1037/Xlm0000070  0.545
2015 Mulligan NW, Peterson DJ. Negative and positive testing effects in terms of item-specific and relational information. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 41: 859-71. PMID 25181496 DOI: 10.1037/Xlm0000056  0.564
2015 Mulligan NW, Spataro P. Divided attention can enhance early-phase memory encoding: the attentional boost effect and study trial duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 41: 1223-8. PMID 25181494 DOI: 10.1037/Xlm0000055  0.598
2014 Rossi-Arnaud C, Spataro P, Saraulli D, Mulligan NW, Sciarretta A, Marques VR, Cestari V. The attentional boost effect in schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 123: 588-97. PMID 24933277 DOI: 10.1037/A0037194  0.466
2014 Mulligan NW, Spataro P, Picklesimer M. The attentional boost effect with verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 40: 1049-63. PMID 24611436 DOI: 10.1037/A0036163  0.602
2014 Mulligan NW, Peterson DJ. Analysis of the encoding factors that produce the negative repetition effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 40: 765-75. PMID 24548323 DOI: 10.1037/A0035577  0.588
2014 Besken M, Mulligan NW. Perceptual fluency, auditory generation, and metamemory: analyzing the perceptual fluency hypothesis in the auditory modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 40: 429-40. PMID 24016138 DOI: 10.1037/A0034407  0.848
2014 Mulligan NW. Memory for pictures and actions The Sage Handbook of Applied Memory. 20-36. DOI: 10.4135/9781446294703.n2  0.51
2013 Susser JA, Mulligan NW, Besken M. The effects of list composition and perceptual fluency on judgments of learning (JOLs). Memory & Cognition. 41: 1000-11. PMID 23661189 DOI: 10.3758/S13421-013-0323-8  0.817
2013 Besken M, Mulligan NW. Easily perceived, easily remembered? Perceptual interference produces a double dissociation between metamemory and memory performance. Memory & Cognition. 41: 897-903. PMID 23460317 DOI: 10.3758/S13421-013-0307-8  0.858
2013 Mulligan NW, Peterson DJ. The negative repetition effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 39: 1403-16. PMID 23421508 DOI: 10.1037/A0031789  0.651
2013 Peterson DJ, Mulligan NW. The negative testing effect and multifactor account. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 39: 1287-93. PMID 23421505 DOI: 10.1037/A0031337  0.65
2013 Spataro P, Mulligan NW, Rossi-Arnaud C. Divided attention can enhance memory encoding: the attentional boost effect in implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 39: 1223-31. PMID 23356238 DOI: 10.1037/A0030907  0.654
2013 Northup T, Mulligan N. Online Advertisements and Conceptual Implicit Memory: Advances in Theory and Methodology Applied Cognitive Psychology. 28: 66-78. DOI: 10.1002/Acp.2958  0.626
2012 Peterson DJ, Mulligan NW. A negative effect of repetition in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 38: 1786-91. PMID 22545610 DOI: 10.1037/A0028220  0.591
2012 Mulligan NW. Differentiating between conceptual implicit and explicit memory: a crossed double dissociation between category-exemplar production and category-cued recall. Psychological Science. 23: 404-6. PMID 22421202 DOI: 10.1177/0956797611433335  0.509
2012 Spataro P, Mulligan NW, Longobardi E, Rossi-Arnaud C. Effects of Age-of-Acquisition in the Word-Fragment Completion Task: evidence for an orthographic locus in implicit memory. Experimental Psychology. 59: 22-9. PMID 21768067 DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/A000121  0.587
2012 Mulligan NW. Conceptual Implicit Memory and the Item-Specific-Relational Distinction Distinctiveness and Memory. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195169669.003.0009  0.598
2012 Mulligan NW, Picklesimer M. Levels of processing and the cue-dependent nature of recollection Journal of Memory and Language. 66: 79-92. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jml.2011.10.001  0.573
2012 Northup T, Mulligan N. Conceptual Implicit Memory in Advertising Research Applied Cognitive Psychology. 27: 127-136. DOI: 10.1002/Acp.2892  0.611
2011 Mulligan NW. Implicit memory and depression: preserved conceptual priming in subclinical depression. Cognition & Emotion. 25: 730-9. PMID 21547774 DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2010.500479  0.523
2011 Mulligan NW. Generation disrupts memory for intrinsic context but not extrinsic context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006). 64: 1543-62. PMID 21500106 DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.562980  0.669
2011 Mulligan NW. The effect of generation on long-term repetition priming in auditory and visual perceptual identification. Acta Psychologica. 137: 18-23. PMID 21388613 DOI: 10.1016/J.Actpsy.2011.02.001  0.527
2011 Mulligan NW. Conceptual implicit memory and environmental context. Consciousness and Cognition. 20: 737-44. PMID 21130669 DOI: 10.1016/J.Concog.2010.11.008  0.662
2011 Spataro P, Mulligan NW, Rossi-Arnaud C. Attention and implicit memory. Experimental Psychology. 58: 110-6. PMID 20494862 DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/A000074  0.47
2010 Besken M, Mulligan NW. Context effects in auditory implicit memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006). 63: 2012-30. PMID 20401812 DOI: 10.1080/17470211003660501  0.82
2010 Mulligan NW, Besken M, Peterson D. Remember-Know and source memory instructions can qualitatively change old-new recognition accuracy: the modality-match effect in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 36: 558-66. PMID 20192551 DOI: 10.1037/A0018408  0.839
2010 Peterson DJ, Mulligan NW. Enactment and retrieval. Memory & Cognition. 38: 233-43. PMID 20173195 DOI: 10.3758/Mc.38.2.233  0.645
2010 Spataro P, Mulligan N, Rossi-Arnaud C. Effects of divided attention in the word-fragment completion task with unique and multiple solutions European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 22: 18-45. DOI: 10.1080/09541440802685979  0.521
2010 Lozito JP, Mulligan NW. Exploring the role of attention during implicit memory retrieval Journal of Memory and Language. 63: 387-399. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jml.2010.06.007  0.831
2009 Mulligan NW, Dew IT. Generation and perceptual implicit memory: different generation tasks produce different effects on perceptual priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 35: 1522-38. PMID 19857021 DOI: 10.1037/A0017398  0.609
2009 Mulligan NW, Osborn K. The modality-match effect in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 35: 564-71. PMID 19271869 DOI: 10.1037/A0014524  0.672
2008 Mulligan NW, Peterson D. Assessing a retrieval account of the generation and perceptual-interference effects. Memory & Cognition. 36: 1371-82. PMID 19015497 DOI: 10.3758/Mc.36.8.1371  0.664
2008 Dew IT, Mulligan NW. The effects of generation on auditory implicit memory. Memory & Cognition. 36: 1157-67. PMID 18927034 DOI: 10.3758/Mc.36.6.1157  0.608
2008 Mulligan NW, Peterson D. Attention and implicit memory in the category-verification and lexical decision tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 34: 662-79. PMID 18444763 DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.662  0.452
2007 Mulligan NW. The revelation effect: moderating influences of encoding conditions and type of recognition test. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 14: 866-70. PMID 18087951 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03194113  0.619
2007 Mulligan NW, Duke M, Cooper AW. The effects of divided attention on auditory priming. Memory & Cognition. 35: 1245-54. PMID 18035624 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03193598  0.632
2007 Mulligan NW, Lozito JP. Order information and free recall: evaluating the item-order hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006). 60: 732-51. PMID 17455079 DOI: 10.1080/17470210600785141  0.809
2006 Lozito JP, Mulligan NW. Exploring the role of attention during memory retrieval: effects of semantic encoding and divided attention. Memory & Cognition. 34: 986-98. PMID 17128598 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03193246  0.845
2006 Mulligan NW, Lozito JP, Rosner ZA. Generation and context memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 32: 836-46. PMID 16822151 DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.836  0.846
2006 Mulligan NW. Hypermnesia and total retrieval time. Memory (Hove, England). 14: 502-18. PMID 16766451 DOI: 10.1080/09658210500513438  0.449
2006 Mulligan NW, Lozito JP. An asymmetry between memory encoding and retrieval. Revelation, generation, and transfer-appropriate processing. Psychological Science. 17: 7-11. PMID 16371137 DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-9280.2005.01657.X  0.842
2005 Mulligan NW. Total retrieval time and hypermnesia: investigating the benefits of multiple recall tests. Psychological Research. 69: 272-84. PMID 15168120 DOI: 10.1007/S00426-004-0178-5  0.504
2004 Hornstein SL, Mulligan NW. Memory for actions: enactment and source memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 11: 367-72. PMID 15260207 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03196584  0.628
2004 Mulligan NW. Generation and memory for contextual detail. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 30: 838-55. PMID 15238028 DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.838  0.675
2004 Mulligan NW, Lozito JP. Self-Generation and Memory Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory. 45: 175-214. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-7421(03)45005-6  0.823
2003 Mulligan NW, Wiesen C. Using the analysis of covariance to increase the power of priming experiments. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology = Revue Canadienne De Psychologie ExpéRimentale. 57: 152-66. PMID 14596474 DOI: 10.1037/H0087422  0.404
2003 Hornstein SL, Brown AS, Mulligan NW. Long-term flashbulb memory for learning of Princess Diana's death. Memory (Hove, England). 11: 293-306. PMID 12908677 DOI: 10.1080/09658210244000063  0.564
2003 Mulligan NW, Hornstein SL. Memory for actions: self-performed tasks and the reenactment effect. Memory & Cognition. 31: 412-21. PMID 12795483 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03194399  0.621
2003 Ossmann JM, Mulligan NW. Inhibition and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults. The American Journal of Psychology. 116: 35-50. PMID 12710221 DOI: 10.2307/1423334  0.359
2003 Mulligan NW. Effects of cross-modal and intramodal division of attention on perceptual implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 29: 262-76. PMID 12696814 DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.262  0.579
2002 Mulligan NW, Duke MD. Positive and negative generation effects, hypermnesia, and total recall time. Memory & Cognition. 30: 1044-53. PMID 12507369 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03194322  0.502
2002 Mulligan NW. The generation effect: dissociating enhanced item memory and disrupted order memory. Memory & Cognition. 30: 850-61. PMID 12450089 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03195771  0.681
2002 Mulligan NW. Attention and perceptual implicit memory: effects of selective versus divided attention and number of visual objects. Psychological Research. 66: 157-65. PMID 12192444 DOI: 10.1007/S00426-002-0089-2  0.537
2002 Mulligan NW. The emergence of item-specific encoding effects in between-subjects designs: perceptual interference and multiple recall tests. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 9: 375-82. PMID 12120803 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03196296  0.611
2002 Mulligan NW. The emergent generation effect and hypermnesia: influences of semantic and nonsemantic generation tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 28: 541-54. PMID 12018506 DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.541  0.497
2002 Mulligan NW. The effects of generation on conceptual implicit memory Journal of Memory and Language. 47: 327-342. DOI: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00006-2  0.694
2001 Mulligan NW. Word frequency and memory: Effects on absolute versus relative order memory and on item memory versus order memory Memory and Cognition. 29: 977-985. PMID 11820757 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03195760  0.588
2001 Hornstein SL, Mulligan NW. Memory of action events: The role of objects in memory of self-and other-performed tasks American Journal of Psychology. 114: 199-217. PMID 11430149 DOI: 10.2307/1423515  0.587
2001 Mulligan NW. Generation and Hypermnesia Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition. 27: 436-450. PMID 11294442 DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.436  0.479
2000 Mulligan NW. Perceptual interference at encoding enhances item-specific encoding and disrupts relational encoding: Evidence from multiple recall tests Memory and Cognition. 28: 539-546. PMID 10946537 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03201244  0.584
2000 Mulligan NW, Hornstein SL. Attention and Perceptual Priming in the Perceptual Identification Task Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition. 26: 626-637. PMID 10855421 DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.626  0.559
2000 Mulligan NW. Perceptual Interference and Memory for Order Journal of Memory and Language. 43: 680-697. DOI: 10.1006/Jmla.2000.2721  0.657
1999 Mulligan NW, Guyer PS, Beland A. The effects of levels-of-processing and organization on conceptual implicit memory in the category exemplar production test. Memory & Cognition. 27: 633-47. PMID 10479822 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03211557  0.574
1999 Mulligan NW. The Effects of Perceptual Interference at Encoding on Organization and Order: Investigating the Roles of Item-Specific and Relational Information Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition. 25: 54-69. PMID 9949708 DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.54  0.555
1999 Mulligan NW. Applying a theory of implicit and explicit knowledge to memory research Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 22: 775-776. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X99452185  0.56
1999 Mulligan NW, Stone M. Attention and Conceptual Priming: Limits on the Effects of Divided Attention in the Category-Exemplar Production Task Journal of Memory and Language. 41: 253-280. DOI: 10.1006/Jmla.1999.2648  0.477
1998 Mulligan NW. The role of attention during encoding in implicit and explicit memory Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition. 24: 27-47. PMID 9438952 DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.24.1.27  0.664
1998 Mulligan NW. Perceptual interference at encoding enhances recall for high- But not low-imageability words Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 5: 464-469. DOI: 10.3758/Bf03208823  0.489
1997 Ward P, Johnson LA, Mulligan NW, Ward MC, Jones DL. Improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills retention: effect of two checklists designed to prompt correct performance. Resuscitation. 34: 221-5. PMID 9178382 DOI: 10.1016/S0300-9572(96)01069-6  0.311
1997 Mulligan NW. Attention and implicit memory tests: The effects of varying attentional load on conceptual priming Memory and Cognition. 25: 11-17. PMID 9046866 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03197281  0.633
1997 Mulligan NW, Hirshman E. Measuring the bases of recognition memory: An investigation of the process-dissociation framework Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 23: 280-304. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.23.2.280  0.572
1996 Mulligan NW. The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on implicit memory, explicit memory, and memory for source Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition. 22: 1067-1087. PMID 8805816 DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.5.1067  0.687
1996 Mulligan NW, Hartman M. Divided attention and indirect memory tests Memory &Amp; Cognition. 24: 453-465. PMID 8757494 DOI: 10.3758/Bf03200934  0.664
1995 Mulligan N, Hirshman E. Speed-Accuracy Trade-Offs and the Dual Process Model of Recognition Memory Journal of Memory and Language. 34: 1-18. DOI: 10.1006/Jmla.1995.1001  0.565
1994 Hirshman E, Trembath D, Mulligan N. Theoretical implications of the mnemonic benefits of perceptual interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 20: 608-620. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.3.608  0.671
1991 Hirshman E, Mulligan N. Perceptual interference improves explicit memory but does not enhance data-driven processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 17: 507-513. PMID 1829474 DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.17.3.507  0.583
Show low-probability matches.