Lee Osterhout - US grants
Affiliations: | Psychology | University of Washington, Seattle, Seattle, WA |
Area:
Neurolinguistics, language processingWebsite:
http://depts.washington.edu/behneuro/research_directory/directory/faculty/osterhout.shtmlWe are testing a new system for linking grants to scientists.
The funding information displayed below comes from the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools and the NSF Award Database.The grant data on this page is limited to grants awarded in the United States and is thus partial. It can nonetheless be used to understand how funding patterns influence mentorship networks and vice-versa, which has deep implications on how research is done.
You can help! If you notice any innacuracies, please sign in and mark grants as correct or incorrect matches.
High-probability grants
According to our matching algorithm, Lee Osterhout is the likely recipient of the following grants.Years | Recipients | Code | Title / Keywords | Matching score |
---|---|---|---|---|
1993 — 2009 | Osterhout, Lee E | R01Activity Code Description: To support a discrete, specified, circumscribed project to be performed by the named investigator(s) in an area representing his or her specific interest and competencies. R29Activity Code Description: Undocumented code - click on the grant title for more information. |
Electrophysiology of Language Processes @ University of Washington The proposed research will investigate the cognitive and neurological processes underlying language comprehension. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) will be recorded while subjects read or listen to sentences containing specific deviations from well-formedness. Two approaches are taken in examining ERP effects associated with language comprehension. The first approach focuses on the ERP components themselves, in an attempt to learn more about the cognitive events underlying these effects. Recent work has indicated that syntactic and semantic anomaly elicit distinct ERP effects (the P600 and N400 effects, respectively). The proposed research investigates the hypothesis that these effects are elicited as a function of the linguistic level of the anomaly. The second approach focuses on the process of comprehension. How does the comprehender rapidly derive a single, coherent interpretation of the language input? How quickly are relevant types of information used, and which types of information have precedence over other types of information? The proposed research will use ERP responses to linguistic anomalies to investigate the use of information during language comprehension. Specifically, these experiments will examine the use of information in resolving ambiguity at the syntactic and coreferential levels of analysis. Finally, how similar are the processes that underlie the comprehension of written and spoken language? The proposed research will investigate this question by directly contrasting the ERP response to written and spoken sentences. Although the proposed experiments involve normal adult subjects, one long-term goal is to study language comprehension in children and adults with language disabilities (e.g., the dyslexias and aphasias). The studies proposed here, by furthering our knowledge concerning the cognitive and neural bases of comprehension in normal comprehenders, provide a critical starting point for subsequent ERP investigations of language pathologies. |
0.958 |
2010 — 2012 | Tanner, Darren Osterhout, Lee |
N/AActivity Code Description: No activity code was retrieved: click on the grant title for more information |
@ University of Washington Many languages of the world show grammatical agreement of some sort, where the grammatical features of a linguistic constituent are visible on another associated constituent. Recent psycholinguistic research has uncovered a number of semantic and syntactic factors that influence how we compute agreement during language production, though much less is known about how these factors interact during language comprehension. Understanding the processing of agreement is also of critical importance in the field of second language acquisition (SLA), as it is frequently observed that second language (L2) learners show considerable trouble with grammatical agreement, often despite many years of formal language instruction and immersion in an L2 environment. Many SLA scholars have proposed that L2 learners' problems with agreement are the result of processing problems, though little research has directly investigated this. |
1 |
2013 — 2017 | Osterhout, Lee | N/AActivity Code Description: No activity code was retrieved: click on the grant title for more information |
Electrophysiology of Non-Native Language Acquisition and Attrition @ University of Washington Global changes in transportation and communication have placed a premium on the ability to speak two or more languages. However, learning a third language (L3) can interfere with the learner's proficiency in a previously acquired second (L2) language, a phenomenon referred to as language attrition. Fundamental questions about why languages attrite, how they attrite, and what aspects of language are most susceptible to attrition remain unanswered. This proposal seeks to better understand how the learning of a new language (L3) can interfere with the learner's proficiency with a previously acquired non-native language (L2), in the context of real-world language learning among college students. Dr. Lee Osterhout, from the University of Washington, will perform three experiments using a high density EEG-based brain activity measure to longitudinally investigate changes in learners' ability to process sentences in their L3 (Italian) and in their L2 (a similar language, Spanish, or a less similar language, such as Japanese). Because the brain activity measure is differentially sensitive to aspects of linguistic meaning and grammar, the results will provide a specific understanding of what linguistic knowledge (for both the L2 and L3) has been gained or lost, and how the acquisition of one language influences the loss of another. |
1 |