Daniel R. Little

Psychological Sciences University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 
Logical Rules, Reaction Times, Knowledge Representation, Categorization, Memory, Explanation Formation, Bayes
"Daniel Little"
Mean distance: 14.93 (cluster 15)
Cross-listing: PsychTree

BETA: Related publications


You can help our author matching system! If you notice any publications incorrectly attributed to this author, please sign in and mark matches as correct or incorrect.

Lewandowsky S, Dennis S, Perfors A, et al. (2021) Public acceptance of privacy-encroaching policies to address the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. Plos One. 16: e0245740
Garrett PM, White JP, Lewandowsky S, et al. (2021) The acceptability and uptake of smartphone tracking for COVID-19 in Australia. Plos One. 16: e0244827
Howard ZL, Garrett P, Little DR, et al. (2020) A show about nothing: No-signal processes in systems factorial technology. Psychological Review
Blunden AG, Howe PDL, Little DR. (2019) Evidence that within-dimension features are generally processed coactively. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
Webb ME, Laukkonen RE, Cropper SJ, et al. (2019) Commentary: Moment of (Perceived) Truth: Exploring Accuracy of Aha! Experiences Journal of Creative Behavior
Cheng XJ, McCarthy CJ, Wang TSL, et al. (2018) Composite faces are not (necessarily) processed coactively: A test using systems factorial technology and logical-rule models. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Baribault B, Donkin C, Little DR, et al. (2018) Metastudies for robust tests of theory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 115: 2607-2612
Little DR, Eidels A, Houpt JW, et al. (2017) Set size slope still does not distinguish parallel from serial search. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 40: e145
Webb ME, Little DR, Cropper SJ. (2017) Once more with feeling: Normative data for the aha experience in insight and noninsight problems. Behavior Research Methods
Wang TS, Christie N, Howe PD, et al. (2016) Global Cue Inconsistency Diminishes Learning of Cue Validity. Frontiers in Psychology. 7: 1743
See more...