Jake Quilty-Dunn - Publications
Affiliations: | 2013-2018 | Philosophy | City University of New York, New York, NY, United States |
Year | Citation | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | Quilty-Dunn J, Porot N, Mandelbaum E. The language-of-thought hypothesis as a working hypothesis in cognitive science. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 46: e292. PMID 37766639 DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X23002431 | 0.654 | |||
2022 | Mandelbaum E, Dunham Y, Feiman R, Firestone C, Green EJ, Harris D, Kibbe MM, Kurdi B, Mylopoulos M, Shepherd J, Wellwood A, Porot N, Quilty-Dunn J. Problems and Mysteries of the Many Languages of Thought. Cognitive Science. 46: e13225. PMID 36537721 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.13225 | 0.663 | |||
2022 | Quilty-Dunn J, Porot N, Mandelbaum E. The Best Game in Town: The Re-Emergence of the Language of Thought Hypothesis Across the Cognitive Sciences. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1-55. PMID 36471543 DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X22002849 | 0.665 | |||
2020 | Epstein ML, Quilty-Dunn J, Mandelbaum E, Emmanouil TA. The outlier paradox: The role of iterative ensemble coding in discounting outliers. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. PMID 32757592 DOI: 10.1037/Xhp0000857 | 0.63 | |||
2020 | Quilty-Dunn J. Rationalization is irrational and self-serving, but useful. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 43: e42. PMID 32292147 DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X19002218 | 0.407 | |||
2018 | Berger J, Nanay B, Quilty-Dunn J. Unconscious perceptual justification Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines. 61: 569-589. DOI: 10.1080/0020174X.2018.1432413 | 0.303 | |||
2017 | Quilty-Dunn J, Mandelbaum E. Inferential Transitions Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 96: 532-547. DOI: 10.1080/00048402.2017.1358754 | 0.574 | |||
2017 | Quilty-Dunn J, Mandelbaum E. Against dispositionalism: belief in cognitive science Philosophical Studies. 175: 2353-2372. DOI: 10.1007/S11098-017-0962-X | 0.695 | |||
2015 | Mandelbaum E, Quilty-Dunn J. Believing without Reason: or: Why Liberals Shouldn’t Watch Fox News The Harvard Review of Philosophy. 22: 42-52. DOI: 10.5840/Harvardreview2015226 | 0.627 | |||
Show low-probability matches. |