Year |
Citation |
Score |
2018 |
Wang G, Van Iddekinge CH, Zhang L, Bishoff J. Meta-analytic and primary investigations of the role of followers in ratings of leadership behavior in organizations. The Journal of Applied Psychology. PMID 30265017 DOI: 10.1037/apl0000345 |
0.327 |
|
2016 |
Frieder RE, Van Iddekinge CH, Raymark PH. How quickly do interviewers reach decisions? An examination of interviewers' decision-making time across applicants Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 89: 223-248. DOI: 10.1111/joop.12118 |
0.669 |
|
2012 |
Van Iddekinge CH, Roth PL, Raymark PH, Odle-Dusseau HN. The critical role of the research question, inclusion criteria, and transparency in meta-analyses of integrity test research: a reply to Harris et al. (2012) and Ones, Viswesvaran, and Schmidt (2012). The Journal of Applied Psychology. 97: 543-9; discussion 53. PMID 22582729 DOI: 10.1037/A0026551 |
0.697 |
|
2012 |
Van Iddekinge CH, Roth PL, Raymark PH, Odle-Dusseau HN. The criterion-related validity of integrity tests: an updated meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 97: 499-530. PMID 21319880 DOI: 10.1037/A0021196 |
0.703 |
|
2011 |
Van Iddekinge CH, Roth PL, Putka DJ, Lanivich SE. Are you interested? A meta-analysis of relations between vocational interests and employee performance and turnover. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 96: 1167-94. PMID 21744941 DOI: 10.1037/A0024343 |
0.323 |
|
2011 |
Van Iddekinge CH, Putka DJ, Campbell JP. Reconsidering vocational interests for personnel selection: the validity of an interest-based selection test in relation to job knowledge, job performance, and continuance intentions. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 96: 13-33. PMID 20919794 DOI: 10.1037/A0021193 |
0.311 |
|
2011 |
Van Iddekinge CH, Raymark PH, Eidson CE. An Examination of the Validity and Incremental Value of Needed-at-Entry Ratings for a Customer Service Job Applied Psychology. 60: 24-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00425.x |
0.668 |
|
2010 |
Mccarthy JM, Van Iddekinge CH, Campion MA. Are highly structured job interviews resistant to demographic similarity effects? Personnel Psychology. 63: 325-359. DOI: 10.1111/J.1744-6570.2010.01172.X |
0.309 |
|
2007 |
Van Iddekinge CH, McFarland LA, Raymark PH. Antecedents of impression management use and effectiveness in a structured interview Journal of Management. 33: 752-773. DOI: 10.1177/0149206307305563 |
0.692 |
|
2006 |
Van Iddekinge CH, Raymark PH, Roth PL, Payne HS. Comparing the psychometric characteristics of ratings of face-to-face and videotaped structured interviews International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 14: 347-359. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00356.x |
0.695 |
|
2005 |
Van Iddekinge CH, Raymark PH, Roth PL. Assessing personality with a structured employment interview: construct-related validity and susceptibility to response inflation. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 90: 536-52. PMID 15910148 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.536 |
0.706 |
|
2005 |
Van Iddekinge CH, Putka DJ, Raymark PH, Eidson CE. Modeling error variance in job specification ratings: the influence of rater, job, and organization-level factors. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 90: 323-34. PMID 15769241 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.323 |
0.677 |
|
2005 |
Van Iddekinge CH, Taylor MA, Eidson CE. Broad versus narrow facets of integrity: Predictive validity and subgroup differences Human Performance. 18: 151-177. DOI: 10.1207/s15327043hup1802_3 |
0.308 |
|
2004 |
Van Iddekinge CH, Raymark PH, Eidson CE, Attenweiler WJ. What Do Structured Selection Interviews Really Measure? The Construct Validity of Behavior Description Interviews Human Performance. 17: 71-93. |
0.683 |
|
Show low-probability matches. |