Stephen Stark - Publications

Affiliations: 
Psychology University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States 

50 high-probability publications. We are testing a new system for linking publications to authors. You can help! If you notice any inaccuracies, please sign in and mark papers as correct or incorrect matches. If you identify any major omissions or other inaccuracies in the publication list, please let us know.

Year Citation  Score
2021 Joo SH, Lee P, Stark S. Modeling Multidimensional Forced Choice Measures with the Zinnes and Griggs Pairwise Preference Item Response Theory Model. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1-21. PMID 34370564 DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2021.1960142  0.64
2020 Ng V, Lee P, Ho MR, Kuykendall L, Stark S, Tay L. The Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format Character Measure: Testing the Thurstonian IRT Approach. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1-14. PMID 32208939 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1739056  0.64
2019 Joo SH, Lee P, Stark S. Adaptive testing with the GGUM-RANK multidimensional forced choice model: Comparison of pair, triplet, and tetrad scoring. Behavior Research Methods. PMID 31342469 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01274-6  0.64
2019 Cao C, Kim ES, Chen YH, Ferron J, Stark S. Exploring the Test of Covariate Moderation Effects in Multilevel MIMIC Models. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 79: 512-544. PMID 31105321 DOI: 10.1177/0013164418793490  0.4
2019 Lee P, Joo SH, Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. GGUM-RANK Statement and Person Parameter Estimation With Multidimensional Forced Choice Triplets. Applied Psychological Measurement. 43: 226-240. PMID 31019358 DOI: 10.1177/0146621618768294  1
2019 Joo SH, Chun S, Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. Item Parameter Estimation With the General Hyperbolic Cosine Ideal Point IRT Model. Applied Psychological Measurement. 43: 18-33. PMID 30573932 DOI: 10.1177/0146621618758697  1
2017 Lee P, Joo SH, Stark S. Linking Methods for the Zinnes-Griggs Pairwise Preference IRT Model. Applied Psychological Measurement. 41: 130-144. PMID 29881082 DOI: 10.1177/0146621616675836  0.64
2017 Joo SH, Lee P, Stark S. Evaluating Anchor-Item Designs for Concurrent Calibration With the GGUM. Applied Psychological Measurement. 41: 83-96. PMID 29881079 DOI: 10.1177/0146621616673997  0.64
2016 Wang W, Lee P, Joo SH, Stark S, Louden R. MCMC Z-G: An IRT Computer Program for Forced-Choice Noncognitive Measurement. Applied Psychological Measurement. 40: 551-553. PMID 29881069 DOI: 10.1177/0146621616663682  0.64
2016 Chun S, Stark S, Kim ES, Chernyshenko OS. MIMIC Methods for Detecting DIF Among Multiple Groups: Exploring a New Sequential-Free Baseline Procedure. Applied Psychological Measurement. 40: 486-499. PMID 29881065 DOI: 10.1177/0146621616659738  1
2016 Chun S, Harris A, Carrion M, Rojas E, Stark S, Lejuez C, Lechner WV, Bornovalova MA. A Psychometric Investigation of Gender Differences and Common Processes Across Borderline and Antisocial Personality Disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. PMID 27808543 DOI: 10.1037/Abn0000220  0.4
2016 Wang W, Lee P, Joo SH, Stark S, Louden R. MCMC Z-G: An IRT Computer Program for Forced-Choice Noncognitive Measurement Applied Psychological Measurement. 40: 551-553. DOI: 10.1177/0146621616663682  1
2016 Chun S, Stark S, Kim ES, Chernyshenko OS. MIMIC Methods for Detecting DIF Among Multiple Groups: Exploring a New Sequential-Free Baseline Procedure Applied Psychological Measurement. 40: 486-499. DOI: 10.1177/0146621616659738  1
2016 Kim ES, Joo SH, Lee P, Wang Y, Stark S. Measurement Invariance Testing Across Between-Level Latent Classes Using Multilevel Factor Mixture Modeling Structural Equation Modeling. 1-18. DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2016.1196108  1
2015 Rojas EC, Hicks BM, Stark S, Hopwood CJ, Bornovalova MA. Elaborating on the construct validity of the Minnesota Borderline Personality Disorder Scale (MBPD): a multi-sample, longitudinal examination. Psychological Assessment. 27: 332-9. PMID 25558963 DOI: 10.1037/Pas0000061  1
2015 Guenole N, Chernyshenko O, Stark S, Drasgow F. Are predictions based on situational judgement tests precise enough for feedback in leadership development? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 24: 433-443. DOI: 10.1080/1359432X.2014.926890  1
2014 Woo SE, Chernyshenko OS, Stark SE, Conz G. Validity of six openness facets in predicting work behaviors: a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment. 96: 76-86. PMID 23795997 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2013.806329  1
2014 Woo SE, Chernyshenko OS, Longley A, Zhang ZX, Chiu CY, Stark SE. Openness to Experience: its lower level structure, measurement, and cross-cultural equivalence. Journal of Personality Assessment. 96: 29-45. PMID 23795950 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2013.806328  1
2014 Lee P, Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. Detecting aberrant responding on unidimensional Pairwise preference tests: An application of lz based on the Zinnes–Griggs ideal point IRT model Applied Psychological Measurement. 38: 391-403. DOI: 10.1177/0146621614526636  1
2014 Seybert J, Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. Detecting DIF With Ideal Point Models: A Comparison of Area and Parameter Difference Methods Applied Psychological Measurement. 38: 151-165. DOI: 10.1177/0146621613508306  1
2014 Mcabee ST, Oswald FL, King EB, Allen TD, Stark S, Converse PD, Eby LT, Leslie LM, Meyer RD, Rogelberg SG, Yang LQ. Including Science Advocacy in Industrial-Organizational Curriculum Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 7: 61-65. DOI: 10.1111/Iops.12107  0.4
2014 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F, Nye CD, White LA, Heffner T, Farmer WL. From ABLE to TAPAS: A new generation of personality tests to support military selection and classification decisions Military Psychology. 26: 153-164. DOI: 10.1037/Mil0000044  1
2013 Guenole N, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Cockerill T, Drasgow F. More than a mirage: A large-scale assessment centre with more dimension variance than exercise variance Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 86: 5-21. DOI: 10.1111/J.2044-8325.2012.02063.X  1
2013 Cho E, Tay L, Allen TD, Stark S. Identification of a dispositional tendency to experience work-family spillover Journal of Vocational Behavior. 82: 188-198. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jvb.2013.01.006  1
2012 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F, White LA. Adaptive Testing With Multidimensional Pairwise Preference Items: Improving the Efficiency of Personality and Other Noncognitive Assessments Organizational Research Methods. 15: 463-487. DOI: 10.1177/1094428112444611  1
2012 Drasgow F, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S. Test Theory and Personality Measurement Oxford Handbook of Personality Assessment. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195366877.013.0004  1
2011 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Guenole N. Can subject matter experts' ratings of statement extremity be used to streamline the development of unidimensional pairwise preference scales? Organizational Research Methods. 14: 256-278. DOI: 10.1177/1094428109356712  1
2011 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F. Constructing Fake-Resistant Personality Tests Using Item Response Theory: High-Stakes Personality Testing with Multidimensional Pairwise Preferences New Perspectives On Faking in Personality Assessment. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387476.003.0061  1
2011 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. Computerized adaptive testing with the zinnes and griggs pairwise preference ideal point model International Journal of Testing. 11: 231-247. DOI: 10.1080/15305058.2011.561459  1
2011 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F, Lee WC, White LA, Young MC. Optimizing prediction of attrition with the U.S.Army's assessment of individual motivation (AIM) Military Psychology. 23: 180-201. DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2011.550234  1
2009 Lopez Rivas GE, Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. The effects of referent item parameters on differential item functioning detection using the free baseline likelihood ratio test Applied Psychological Measurement. 33: 251-265. DOI: 10.1177/0146621608321760  1
2009 Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Williams A. Latent Trait Theory Approach to Measuring Person-Organization Fit: Conceptual Rationale and Empirical Evaluation International Journal of Testing. 9: 358-380. DOI: 10.1080/15305050903351919  1
2009 Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Prewett MS, Gray AA, Stilson FR, Tuttle MD. Normative scoring of multidimensional pairwise preference personality scales using IRT: Empirical comparisons with other formats Human Performance. 22: 105-127. DOI: 10.1080/08959280902743303  1
2007 Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Drasgow F, Roberts BW. Constructing personality scales under the assumptions of an ideal point response process: toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures. Psychological Assessment. 19: 88-106. PMID 17371125 DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.1.88  1
2007 Crede M, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Dalal RS, Bashshur M. Job satisfaction as mediator: An assessment of job satisfaction's position within the nomological network Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 80: 515-538. DOI: 10.1348/096317906X136180  1
2007 Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Guenole N. Can the discretionary nature of certain criteria lead to differential prediction across cultural groups? International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 15: 175-184. DOI: 10.1111/J.1468-2389.2007.00379.X  1
2006 Cafri G, Thompson JK, Roehrig M, van den Berg P, Jacobsen PB, Stark S. An investigation of appearance motives for tanning: The development and evaluation of the Physical Appearance Reasons For Tanning Scale (PARTS) and its relation to sunbathing and indoor tanning intentions. Body Image. 3: 199-209. PMID 18089223 DOI: 10.1016/J.Bodyim.2006.05.002  1
2006 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F. Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: toward a unified strategy. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 91: 1292-306. PMID 17100485 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1292  1
2006 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F, Williams BA. Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring? The Journal of Applied Psychology. 91: 25-39. PMID 16435936 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.25  1
2006 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS. Multistage testing: Widely or narrowly applicable? Applied Measurement in Education. 19: 257-260. DOI: 10.1207/S15324818Ame1903_6  1
2005 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F. An IRT approach to constructing and scoring pairwise preference items involving stimuli on different dimensions: The multi-unidimensional pairwise-preference model Applied Psychological Measurement. 29: 184-203. DOI: 10.1177/0146621604273988  1
2005 Roberts BW, Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Goldberg LR. The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires Personnel Psychology. 58: 103-139. DOI: 10.1111/J.1744-6570.2005.00301.X  1
2004 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F. Examining the effects of differential item (functioning and differential) test functioning on selection decisions: when are statistically significant effects practically important? The Journal of Applied Psychology. 89: 497-508. PMID 15161408 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.497  1
2004 Roberts BW, Bogg T, Walton KE, Chernyshenko OS, Stark SE. A lexical investigation of the lower-order structure of conscientiousness Journal of Research in Personality. 38: 164-178. DOI: 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00065-5  1
2002 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Lancaster AR, Drasgow F, Fitzgerald LF. Toward Standardized Measurement of Sexual Harassment: Shortening the SEQ-DoD Using Item Response Theory Military Psychology. 14: 49-72. DOI: 10.1207/S15327876Mp1401_03  1
2002 Stark S, Drasgow F. An EM approach to parameter estimation for the Zinnes and Griggs paired comparison IRT model Applied Psychological Measurement. 26: 208-227. DOI: 10.1177/01421602026002007  1
2001 Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Chan KY, Drasgow F, Williams B. Fitting Item Response Theory Models to Two Personality Inventories: Issues and Insights. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 36: 523-62. PMID 26822181 DOI: 10.1207/S15327906Mbr3604_03  1
2001 Borman WC, Buck DE, Hanson MA, Motowidlo SJ, Stark S, Drasgow F. An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 86: 965-73. PMID 11596812 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.965  1
2001 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Chan KY, Lee WC, Drasgow F. Effects of the testing situation on item responding: cause for concern. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 86: 943-53. PMID 11596810 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.943  1
2001 Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Chan KY. Investigating the hierarchical factor structure of the fifth edition of the 16PF: An application of the Schmid-Leiman orthogonalization procedure Educational and Psychological Measurement. 61: 290-302. DOI: 10.1177/00131640121971248  1
Show low-probability matches.