| Year |
Citation |
Score |
| 2021 |
Nebl PJ, McCoy MG, Foster GC, Zickar MJ. Assessment of the Mate Retention Inventory-Short Form Using Item Response Theory. Evolutionary Psychology : An International Journal of Evolutionary Approaches to Psychology and Behavior. 19: 14747049211044150. PMID 34633890 DOI: 10.1177/14747049211044150 |
0.316 |
|
| 2020 |
Zickar MJ. Measurement Development and Evaluation Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 7: 213-232. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-044957 |
0.331 |
|
| 2018 |
Min H, Zickar M, Yankov G. Understanding item parameters in personality scales: An explanatory item response modeling approach Personality and Individual Differences. 128: 1-6. DOI: 10.1016/J.Paid.2018.02.012 |
0.495 |
|
| 2017 |
Foster GC, Min H, Zickar MJ. Review of Item Response Theory Practices in Organizational Research Organizational Research Methods. 20: 465-486. DOI: 10.1177/1094428116689708 |
0.32 |
|
| 2014 |
Sliter KA, Zickar MJ. An IRT Examination of the Psychometric Functioning of Negatively Worded Personality Items Educational and Psychological Measurement. 74: 214-226. DOI: 10.1177/0013164413504584 |
0.744 |
|
| 2013 |
Lake CJ, Withrow S, Zickar MJ, Wood NL, Dalal DK, Bochinski J. Understanding the Relation Between Attitude Involvement and Response Latitude Using Item Response Theory Educational and Psychological Measurement. 73: 690-712. DOI: 10.1177/0013164413482920 |
0.603 |
|
| 2013 |
Carter NT, Daniels MA, Zickar MJ. Projective testing: Historical foundations and uses for human resources management Human Resource Management Review. 23: 205-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.12.002 |
0.57 |
|
| 2012 |
Carter NT, Kotrba LM, Diab DL, Lin BC, Pui SY, Lake CJ, Gillespie MA, Zickar MJ, Chao A. A Comparison of a Subjective and Statistical Method for Establishing Score Comparability in an Organizational Culture Survey Journal of Business and Psychology. 27: 451-466. DOI: 10.1007/s10869-011-9254-1 |
0.577 |
|
| 2011 |
Carter NT, Dalal DK, Lake CJ, Lin BC, Zickar MJ. Using Mixed-Model Item Response Theory to Analyze Organizational Survey Responses: An Illustration Using the Job Descriptive Index Organizational Research Methods. 14: 116-146. DOI: 10.1177/1094428110363309 |
0.666 |
|
| 2011 |
Carter NT, Zickar MJ. A comparison of the LR and dfit frameworks of differential functioning applied to the generalized graded unfolding model Applied Psychological Measurement. 35: 623-642. DOI: 10.1177/0146621611427898 |
0.668 |
|
| 2011 |
Carter NT, Zickar MJ. The influence of dimensionality on parameter estimation accuracy in the generalized graded unfolding model Educational and Psychological Measurement. 71: 765-788. DOI: 10.1177/0013164410387594 |
0.643 |
|
| 2011 |
Zickar MJ, Sliter KA. Searching for Unicorns: Item Response Theory-Based Solutions to the Faking Problem New Perspectives On Faking in Personality Assessment. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387476.003.0038 |
0.743 |
|
| 2010 |
Zickar MJ, Carter NT. Reconnecting with the spirit of workplace ethnography: A historical review Organizational Research Methods. 13: 304-319. DOI: 10.1177/1094428109338070 |
0.585 |
|
| 2010 |
Carter NT, Lake CJ, Zickar MJ. Toward Understanding the Psychology of Unfolding Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 3: 511-514. DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01283.x |
0.553 |
|
| 2010 |
Dalal DK, Withrow S, Gibby RE, Zickar MJ. Six Questions That Practitioners (Might) Have About Ideal Point Response Process Items Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 3: 498-501. DOI: 10.1111/J.1754-9434.2010.01279.X |
0.729 |
|
| 2010 |
Adams JE, Highhouse S, Zickar MJ. Understanding general distrust of corporations Corporate Reputation Review. 13: 38-51. DOI: 10.1057/Crr.2010.6 |
0.316 |
|
| 2008 |
Gibby RE, Zickar MJ. A history of the early days of personality testing in American industry: an obsession with adjustment. History of Psychology. 11: 164-84. PMID 19048975 DOI: 10.1037/A0013041 |
0.742 |
|
| 2008 |
Zickar MJ, Balzer WK, Aziz S, Wryobeck JM. The moderating role of social support between role stressors and job attitudes among Roman Catholic priests Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 38: 2903-2923. DOI: 10.1111/J.1559-1816.2008.00418.X |
0.504 |
|
| 2006 |
Aziz S, Zickar MJ. A cluster analysis investigation of workaholism as a syndrome. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 11: 52-62. PMID 16551174 DOI: 10.1037/1076-8998.11.1.52 |
0.485 |
|
| 2006 |
Erdheim J, Wang M, Zickar MJ. Linking the Big Five personality constructs to organizational commitment Personality and Individual Differences. 41: 959-970. DOI: 10.1016/J.Paid.2006.04.005 |
0.47 |
|
| 2004 |
Slaughter JE, Zickar MJ, Highhouse S, Mohr DC. Personality trait inferences about organizations: development of a measure and assessment of construct validity. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 89: 85-103. PMID 14769122 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.85 |
0.511 |
|
| 2004 |
Zickar MJ, Gibby RE, Robie C. Uncovering Faking Samples in Applicant, Incumbent, and Experimental Data Sets: An Application of Mixed-Model Item Response Theory Organizational Research Methods. 7: 168-190. DOI: 10.1177/1094428104263674 |
0.762 |
|
| 2004 |
Zickar MJ, Gibby RE, Jenny T. Job attitudes of workers with two jobs Journal of Vocational Behavior. 64: 222-235. DOI: 10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00047-2 |
0.721 |
|
| 2002 |
Sinar EF, Zickar MJ. Evaluating the robustness of graded response model and classical test theory parameter estimates to deviant items Applied Psychological Measurement. 26: 181-191. DOI: 10.1177/01421602026002005 |
0.757 |
|
| 2002 |
Zickar MJ, Ury KL. Developing an interpretation of item parameters for personality items: Content correlates of parameter estimates Educational and Psychological Measurement. 62: 19-31. DOI: 10.1177/0013164402062001002 |
0.32 |
|
| 2002 |
Zickar MJ, Russell SS, Smith CS, Bohle P, Tilley AJ. Evaluating two morningness scales with item response theory Personality and Individual Differences. 33: 11-24. DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00131-3 |
0.345 |
|
| 2001 |
Smith C, Gibby R, Zickar M, Crossley C, Robie C, Folkard S, Tucker P, Barton J. Measurement properties of the Shiftwork Survey and Standard Shiftwork Index Journal of Human Ergology. 30: 191-196. PMID 14564881 DOI: 10.11183/Jhe1972.30.191 |
0.752 |
|
| 2001 |
Zickar MJ. Using Personality Inventories to Identify Thugs and Agitators: Applied Psychology's Contribution to the War against Labor Journal of Vocational Behavior. 59: 149-164. DOI: 10.1006/jvbe.2000.1775 |
0.338 |
|
| 2001 |
Robie C, Zickar MJ, Schmit MJ. Measurement Equivalence between Applicant and Incumbent Groups: An IRT Analysis of Personality Scales Human Performance. 14: 187-207. |
0.377 |
|
| 2000 |
Robie C, Schmit MJ, Ryan AM, Zickar MJ. Effects of Item Context Specificity on the Measurement Equivalence of a Personality Inventory Organizational Research Methods. 3: 348-365. |
0.399 |
|
| 1999 |
Zickar MJ, Robie C. Modeling faking good on personality items: An item-level analysis Journal of Applied Psychology. 84: 551-563. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.551 |
0.436 |
|
| 1998 |
Zickar MJ. Modeling item-level data with item response theory Current Directions in Psychological Science. 7: 104-109. |
0.333 |
|
| 1996 |
Drasgow F, Levine MV, Zickar MJ. Optimal Identification of Mismeasured Individuals Applied Measurement in Education. 9: 47-64. DOI: 10.1207/S15324818Ame0901_5 |
0.691 |
|
| 1996 |
Zickar MJ, Drasgow F. Detecting faking on a personality instrument using appropriateness measurement Applied Psychological Measurement. 20: 71-87. DOI: 10.1177/014662169602000107 |
0.615 |
|
| Show low-probability matches. |